Jesus Christ
and the Trustworthiness of the
Bible
A "masterpiece!"
Joe Sherman JOESHERMAN.US/WAY.HTML There are many alternatives out there as we look for what is real and what or who can be
counted on in this life. Jesus Christ made some startling claims. He claimed to be the
Son of God. He claimed to be the only way to get to God and eternal life; “I am the
Way, the Truth, and the Life, and no one comes to the Father except through Me,” He
said in John 14:6. He also made some startling demands. He said that whoever would
follow him must “deny himself, take up his cross, and follow Me” (Matt. 16:24), the
follower giving control of his life to Christ. How can we know if Christ’s claims are true
and his demands viable? These are absolute statements; he didn’t say, “I am a way,” he
said, “I am the Way;” meaning that there is no other. How can we trust these claims?
What about Muhammad and his teachings, or Buddha and his? Muhammad claims that
Jesus was just a prophet, and that Islam is the only true way. Buddha claims that we
ourselves are “God,” and we just haven't realized that this is true; there isn’t just “one
way” to God, there are many ways. Millions of people follow each of these teachers; are
they all wrong? Many people say that they can all be right; this line of thinking is often
found in the eastern religions, such as Buddhism, or Hinduism. However, it is important
to point out that because of the absoluteness of Jesus’ claims (such as that he is the only
way to God), Muhammad and Buddha are necessarily wrong if Christ is correct. Others
point out the seeming paradox of the cult leaders who lead their members to tragedy,
while at the same time identifying with Christ and teaching from the Bible. A recent
example of this would be Herf Applewhite, known as “Do,” and his Heaven’s Gate cult;
Herf Applewhite claiming to be Christ in person, and echoing Jesus’ words, “Follow
me,” while leading his followers to disaster. On the one hand, we find some leaders with
teachings that are clearly not the truth, and yet we find people choosing to follow them
nevertheless, such as these cult leaders. On the other hand, we find various other leaders
that each have teachings that everyone would agree have at least some value and some
truth, and yet at certain points are in complete conflict with each other, leaders such as
Jesus, Muhammad, and Buddha. Our question at this point is, how can we know who is
right and what is the truth? This paper was written to answer this question and to furnish
individuals with a reasonable basis for faith in Christ and His claims. The Christian Message of Salvation God's love, Our Need, God's Provision, Our Response In order to accurately state the case for Christ and the Bible vs. other leaders and their
teachings, it is necessary to first take a look at what Christians believe about God and
salvation. As previously stated, Jesus made the startling claims of being the Son of God,
and the only way to God. According to the Bible, Jesus makes these claims on the
following premises: There is one God, he has always existed, and he created the entire
universe and everything in it. He himself is not created. The following four points are
2 3 1. The one God who created all things loves us (Jn. 3:16). 2. Each of us has gone our own way; we have committed sins, separating
ourselves from God and an eternal relationship with him (Rom.3:23). 3. Because of God’s love for us, although we are unable to earn or
achieve salvation, God paid the price for our sins through Christ, who
died on the cross and rose again; he offers this salvation to us as a free
gift (Rom. 5:8, Eph. 2:8). 4. This gift is received on an individual basis by receiving Christ as Lord
of our life (Jn. 1:12). These are some of the basic premises on which Christ makes his claims to be the Son of
God and the only way to God the Father. Some Background to Christ and Salvation As we compare Christ and his teachings to other teachers, it is necessary to have a clear
understanding of him and his background as the founder of Christianity. Jesus Christ was
4 After teaching about the creation of the world and of man, the Old Testament of the Bible
then teaches and shows how God reached out to man in general ways, such as through
the wonder of creation, for example, and in more specific ways to a few specific
individuals, usually called prophets. One of these prophets was a man named Abram. In
Gen. 12:1-3, God speaks very specifically to Abram, giving him this command and
accompanying promise (Gen. 12:1-3): "Go forth from your country and from your
relatives and from your father's house, to the land which I will show you, and I will make
you a great nation, and I will bless you, and I will make your name great; and so you
shall be a blessing; and I will bless those who bless you, and the one who curses you I
will curse. And in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed." In Gen. 15:4 God
adds to this promise that the nation which shall come from Abram will be taken through
a son from his own body. So Abram was to be blessed by God, and a nation was to come
from him, and this nation God would somehow use to bless the other nations of the earth.
The Bible shows that after a time God appears to Abram and establishes a covenant with
him (Gen. 17:1,2): "Now when Abram was ninety-nine years old, the Lord appeared to
Abram and said to him, 'I am God Almighty; walk before Me and be blameless. And I
will establish My covenant between Me and you, and I will multiply you exceedingly."
God also at this point changed Abram's name to Abraham (meaning 'exalted father').
God then makes it clear that the covenant and blessing would be through Abraham's son,
Isaac, who would be born to Abraham's wife Sarah, "...Sarah shall bear you a son, and
you shall call his name Isaac, and I will establish My covenant with him for an
everlasting covenant for his descendants after him" (Gen. 17:19). Isaac is then born to
Abraham as promised. To Isaac is then born a son Jacob, who is known as Israel, who
then has twelve sons, which become the twelve tribes of Israel, or the nation of Israel. The Jews, as stated above, are of the tribe of Judah, one of the twelve sons of Israel, but
this name has come today to refer to Israelites in general, and 'Judaism' is the faith of the
Israelites. Israel was God's chosen nation (Gen. 17:19), and they were to be set apart to
represent God to the other nations and to tell others of him; "I am the Lord; I have called
you in righteousness, I will also hold you by the hand and watch over you, and I will
appoint you as a covenant to the people, as a light to the nations." God spoke to the
Israelites through prophets, giving them his word (the Old Testament of the Bible, and
later the New Testament) which contained commandments and histories, and which
foretold of a coming Messiah ('Christ', or 'Anointed One'), who would bring a new
covenant and be the Savior for Israel. "'Behold, I am going to send My messenger, and
he will clear the way before Me. And the Lord, whom you seek, will suddenly come to
His
5 The New Testament tells of the arrival of this long awaited Messiah and the new
covenant: "God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions
and in many ways, in these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom He appointed
heir of all things, through whom He also created the world" (Heb.1:1,2). God long ago
promised Abraham that through him all the families of the earth would be blessed.
Although the Jewish people (Israel) had been called to share their faith about God with
the nations around them and thus bless the families, or nations of the earth, Jesus, the
Christ or Messiah, a Jew and a descendant of Abraham, came for the whole world and
thus is God's ultimate fulfillment of his promise to Abraham. "For God so loved the
world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not
perish, but have eternal life" (Jn. 3:16). "And we have beheld and bear witness that the
Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the world" (I Jn. 4:14). Jesus Christ, as the
mediator of the new covenant, came first to the Jews, and then to the whole world,
establishing His church with a historical background and foundation of Judaism and the
Old Testament, but teaching a whole new revelation of God to mankind through the
promised new covenant, this new covenant being a long established plan of God, foretold
of in the Old Testament. This church soon became known as Christianity, which makes
use of the teachings of God in the Old Testament, but in the context of the teachings of
the new covenant of Christ in the New Testament. To summarize, the Old Testament of the Bible tells of a God who creates all things and
then reaches out and establishes a covenant with a particular individual, Abraham,
making him into a great nation and promising he would be a blessing to the whole earth.
God also promises to Abraham's descendents He will make a New Covenant with them,
sending a Messiah to bring this covenant. The New Testament begins with the arrival of
this Messiah, Jesus Christ, who establishes the New Covenant from God, offering
salvation for the whole world through faith in Christ. Jesus Christ vs. Muhammad and Buddha The question remains how can we know that all of this is true, or that what Christ says in
the Bible is right or reliable? What about other teachers, other religions, and other "holy
books" or scriptures? This is an excellent question. In this age of instant information;
the Internet, PCS’s, Direct TV, etc., we are able to be aware more than ever of and be
informed on the teachings of many leaders and religions, with varied teachings from all
parts of the world. While personal investigation is still the best method to learn the
6 Muhammad, the inaugurator of Islam (Islam means submission; i.e., to God), was born
around 570 A.D. At this time in Mecca, Arabia, there was taking place the worship of
many "deities". According to Islamic teaching Muhammad, at age 40, began receiving
revelations and visions regarding the right way to live and regarding the one "true God,"
Allah (Arabic for God).
2 Muhammad did not claim to be without sin. In fact, he viewed
himself as an ordinary man, and claims he was doubtful when he first began receiving the
visions.
3 Upon receiving these revelations, and continuing to receive them, Muhammad
began to preach against the worship of these "deities" and began to preach a right life and
that Allah was the only true God. The followers of Islam became known as Muslims.
These revelations and visions were written down, and were later reassembled into the
Qu'ran, Islam's chief holy book. The Qu'ran, Muslims claim, while written down by a human (originally Muhammad),
was authored word for word by Allah, and delivered to Muhammad by an angel. Taking
the majority of the Bible as its roots, it teaches that Muhammad is the last and greatest of
the prophets, beginning with Adam and Abraham in the Old Testament, and including
Moses, David, and in the New Testament, Jesus Christ. Muslims do not follow the Bible
and its teachings in an exact manner, however. Jesus is considered merely a human
7
To attain eternal life in Islam, the individual must choose to lead a good life, doing good.
The Five Pillars of Faith which the Muslim is to follow are: The profession of faith,
prayer five times a day, alms to the poor, fasting, and, if possible, one pilgrimage to
Mecca.
8 Muslims are judged by Allah on the Last Day and are sent either to eternal life,
consisting of an eternity of sensual pleasures, or eternal hellfire, depending on whether
they choose to follow the Law of Islam (performing the Five Pillars, and the rest of the
teachings), or to lead a life of evil. "Muslim theologians explain that the way to salvation
consists in the due performance of the five duties of Islam."
9 The resultant Islamic view
from the Qu'ran of salvation is that it is determined by the good works vs. the bad (evil)
works of the individual; it is based on how good a life the individual has led. "There is
no assurance of eternal life until the Muslim reaches the day of judgment at which it is
commonly understood that all will be made to walk over the thin edge of a sword
stretched across a deep abyss. Those who succeed will enjoy an eternity of sensual
paradise. Those who fail will be consigned to torment in the raging fires of hell. Faith
8 Buddha, Buddhism, and Hinduism Buddha founded Buddhism at the first half of the sixth century B.C.
11 Born Sidhartha
Gautama, a prince in India close to the Nepal border, he had everything in life, growing
up in a castle. As an adult venturing out of the castle, he saw suffering, which caused
him to seek the meaning to life. After studying under various spiritual teachers, he went
his own way, a moderate path consisting of prayer and fasting. After a night of striving
under a tree he achieved a spiritual "enlightenment," according to Buddhist teachings.
12
Faced with the choice of remaining in this enlightened, blissful state, or teaching others
the way to enlightenment, he chose the latter. 'Buddha' means 'one who has woken up,' or ‘one who knows' (the basic truth of things).
13Anyone who reaches the ‘truth’ is a Buddha. Since Buddha originally studied under
Hindu teachers as Hinduism was developing, most of the basic tenets of faith and central
teachings of Buddhism are the same as Hinduism, such as reincarnation (the concept that
it may take many lifetimes for a human being to reach Nirvana, or, salvation), and the
teaching that all human beings are actually divine. “Now Gautama realized what
Hinduism had always taught: ‘The true self is God, and God is the true self.’”
14 “God… is
not any ‘what,’…He is not any ‘who.’ He is beyond desire, craving, wanting, wishing,
and beyond such unrealities as age, suffering, and death. And when a man has entered
that condition [i.e., becoming God] – when he, too, is above both existence and
nonexistence – he is lost in God. He is in Nirvana.”
15 Buddha, however, came as a
reformer, confronting the fatalism of the Hinduism of his day, teaching that individual
effort does make a difference, and while founding Buddhism, he did in fact have an
impact on Hinduism. Buddhism’s sacred canon of holy books, called the Tipitakas,
contain Buddha’s sayings gathered by his followers, including the saying, “Hurt not
others with that which pains yourself.”
16 Obviously, the ‘God’ of Buddhism is very much different than the God of the Bible. The
God of Buddhism is an impersonal God, not having a personality or feelings, which is in
contrast to the God of the Bible and Christianity, who does have these (Jn. 3:16, above,
and I Pet. 5:7, "casting all your anxieties upon Him, because he cares for you."). The
God of Buddhism is instead an abstract ‘truth,’ or ‘way of the universe,’ supposedly
found inside each one of us. Also, as indicated, Buddhists believe that we ourselves
actually become ‘God.’ Eternal enlightenment, or Nirvana, then, is becoming one with
the truth that, as Buddha claimed, we all are divine or we all are God. This is in stark
contrast to the Christian view of God: There is one God who is eternal and who created
all things; he created human beings and the universe; he is God, we are not. At the end,
those who reach eternal life, according to the Bible, will in heaven still be created beings
while God will still be the Creator. This concept of a personal, Creator God who loves us
(Jn. 3:16)
9 At the core of Buddha's philosophy of human morality is his Four Noble Truths: Life is
suffering; Suffering is caused by desire; Cessation of desire results in cessation of
suffering; There is a path that leads to the cessation of desire.
17 This path that leads to
cessation of desire is known as the Eight-Fold Path: Right views, Right purpose, Right
speech, Right conduct, Right livelihood, Right effort, Right awareness, Right
meditation.
18 Buddha developed this path to assist others in becoming a Buddha, which is
the final life one spends as a human being; after this life one enters Nirvana, becoming
one with God. Hinduism explains this concept of the ‘truth’ of the divinity of human beings, and the
path to arrive at oneness with God in this way: “Underlying man’s personality and
animating it is a reservoir of being that never dies, is never exhausted, and is without
limit in awareness and bliss. This infinite center of every life, this hidden self, or Atman,
is no less than Brahman, the Godhead…The reason we don’t act or appear ‘Godlike,’ is
due to the fact that the Eternal is buried under an almost impenetrable mass of false ideas
and self-regarding impulses that comprise our surface being; in much the same way a
lamp that is covered with layers of dust and dirt can be invisible.”
19 Hindus teach that we
strive to be free from our ego and its false ideas and self-regarding impulses (these being
the causes of evil) to reach our divinity by performing four yogas, or four types of
exercises: Knowledge, Love, Work, and Meditation.
20 These exercises, or disciplines, are
comparable to Buddha’s Eight-Fold Path. In both Buddhism and Hinduism, salvation, or reaching Nirvana, is purely an
achievement of the individual: “Every individual must tread this path himself through his
own energy and initiative. (Buddha said,) ‘Those who, relying upon themselves only,
shall not look for assistance to anyone besides themselves, it is they who shall reach the
topmost height.’ No god or gods can be counted on, not even Buddha himself.”
21 As we have seen from our brief treatment of Muhammad and his teachings, and Buddha
and his teachings, both have at least some aspects which most would argue as true and
good and in agreement with some of the teachings of Christ. For example, Muhammad
taught as of the Five Pillars of Islam to give alms to the poor, and Buddha, in his Eight-Fold Path, taught that right conduct was important, which would include giving to those
in need. Jesus said "give to everyone who asks of you, and do not turn away from him
who wants to borrow from you," Matt. 5:42. So these teachers and their religions, as
well as most likely some of the teachings of other religions, such as Hinduism, do contain
at least some teachings which most would agree are good and true. However, they also
teach things which directly conflict with Christ and the Bible. For example, as we have
10 Jesus Christ, the founder of Christianity, is immediately set apart from Muhammad and
Buddha, in a big way in that his coming, his manner and place of birth, his mission, his
reception and treatment from men, the manner, cause, and purpose of his death, the fact
of and length of time until his resurrection, and even the date in history of his arrival as
Messiah were foretold, or prophesied, over a period of several hundred years in a single
body of prophetic and historic literature, the ancient Jewish Scriptures, which is the
equivalent to the Old Testament of the Christian Bible, and were documented as fulfilled
in the New Testament of the Bible. There were no prophecies concerning Buddha's
coming or mission, and although some Muslims attempt to claim the opposite, there were
no prophecies of Muhammad's coming or mission either. (This Muslim claim holds that
certain Old Testament and New Testament prophecies apply to Muhammad, but this
claim will be shown to be completely without substance at a later point.) The prophecies
we are about to take a look at are astounding in the detail and accuracy of their
predictions of Christ. But can they be trusted as evidence of a God who communicated
to select men the details of a person and events of the future, hundreds of years before the
fact, and therefore as evidence establishing Christ as a miraculous part of the plan of this
God? To answer this, before taking a look at these prophecies and their fulfillments, it is
crucial that we determine the validity, the trustworthiness, of the Bible. 11 To determine the trustworthiness of the Bible, we must ask the standard questions for
testing literature: What evidence do we have? Are there eyewitnesses, and do they seem
to be credible as to their reputation and manner of reporting? How reliable are the
modern-day sources; the manuscript copies on hand today? What kind of 'track record'
does the body of work have? What do the unbiased experts say? Does it have any
outstanding characteristics in its teaching which lend credence to its validity? First of all, one strong evidence of the Bible's validity is the current existence in the
world today of various key peoples and events. The Bible teaches about a Jewish teacher
called Christ who founded the institute of Christianity which then began to spread rapidly
in the world. Today we find the existence of the Christian church throughout most of the
earth. The Bible teaches on, and the Old Testament is largely based on, the nation of
Israel which came into being thousands of years ago and was located in the
Mediterranean. We find a nation called Israel in the Mediterranean. The Bible teaches
that most of the Israelites rejected Jesus Christ, the founder of Christianity. We find
today the existence of both Christians and of Israelites throughout the world, and we find
that the majority of the Israelites do not adhere to Christianity (although there are many
who do). The beginning of this condition is faithfully recorded in the Bible in Acts; for
example, where Peter confronts the unbelieving Israelites after healing a crippled man:
"'...Men of Israel, why does this surprise you? Why do you stare at us as if by our own
power or godliness we had made this man walk? The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob
has glorified His servant Jesus. You handed Him over to be killed, and you disowned
Him before Pilate, though he had decided to let Him go. You disowned the Holy and
Righteous One and asked that a murderer be released to you. You crucified the Author
of Life, but God raised Him from the dead,'" Acts 3:12-15. The result of this speech
is seen in Acts 4:1-4: "The priests and captain of the temple guard and the Sadducees
came up to Peter and John while they were still speaking to the people. They were
greatly disturbed because the apostles were teaching the people and proclaiming the
resurrection of the dead. They seized Peter and John, and because it was evening, they
put them in jail until the next day. But many who heard the message believed, and the
number of men grew to about five thousand." Additionally, as previously discussed, the
Bible claims to be made up of two parts; the old covenant (Old Testament), or God's
covenant with Isaac (and his heir Israel), and the new covenant (New Testament), or
God's new covenant with Israel, not invalidating the old covenant but superceding it
(Jesus said, "Do not think I came to abolish the Law and the Prophets; I did not come to
abolish, but to fulfill," Matt. 5:17; Paul said "Christ is the end (goal) of the Law for
righteousness to everyone who believes," Rom.10:4). The new covenant actually
fulfilled and extended the old covenant to include not only Israel as God's primary
chosen people, but people from all nations who receive the messenger of the new
covenant, Christ, as their Lord and Savior. The Christians we see today follow the new
covenant, making use of both the old and new covenant as their Scriptures, and the non-Christian Jews we see today follow, to varying degrees, the old covenant as their
Scriptures. This existence today of this Jewish faith, the body of Jews practicing to
varying degrees the teachings of the old covenant (of the Bible), and to this day
adamantly claiming it to be God's word to them, is overwhelming
12 Second, also attesting to the validity of the Bible is its consistency in its teachings and its
internal agreement of data. Written by 40 authors over a period of more than 1500 years,
the Bible is perfectly consistent in its teaching of God, his attributes, and his plan of
salvation by faith, from Genesis to Revelation. For instance, in regard to God's plan of
salvation, at the beginning of the Bible in Genesis 15:6 we read of Abraham and how he
obtained a right standing before God (salvation) by faith (belief, or entrustment); “Then
he believed in the Lord, and it was credited to him as righteousness." At the other end of
the Bible, Revelation 1:5b says, "To Him [Jesus] who loves us and has released us from
our sins by His blood;" and Rev. 21:6 says, "And He said to me, 'I am the Alpha and the
Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give to the one who thirsts from the spring of
the water of life without cost.'" These verses, one at the beginning of the Bible and two
at the end, along with others in between, teach that God's plan is not by our achievement
of a good life, through which we could then boast (hence, pride), but instead the
righteousness required for salvation is credited to the account of those who believe, as
with Abraham above, without cost to ourselves, because Jesus paid the price with his
blood on the cross. As another example, the Bible teaches consistently that there is only
one God, and that he created all things. In the Old Testament Isaiah 44:6 says, "Thus
says the Lord, the King of Israel, and his redeemer, the Lord of Hosts: 'I am the first and I
am the last, and there is no God besides Me,'" and Gen. 1:1 says, "In the beginning God
created the heavens and the earth." In the New Testament, we read in I Tim. 2:5a, "There
is one God..," and in Heb. 1:10, "And 'You, Lord, in the beginning laid the foundation of
the earth, and the heavens are the works of Your hands.'" Additionally, the Bible is
internally consistent in its teaching of the life and message of Christ as well. The four
gospel accounts of Christ, written by four different authors from 20 to 60 years after the
events occurred, while giving very different viewpoints of the same events, do not
contradict each other even in the details. "There are no contradictions in the gospels
which would cause us to question their credibility. There are some mysteries, but no
contradictions."
22 Apparent problems or contradictions can be virtually always cleared up
by more in depth investigation. For example, one apparent contradiction frequently cited
by scholars and others is that of the detailed genealogy of Christ in the last portion of
Matt. 1:1-17 not matching up with the corresponding portion of the genealogy of Christ
as reported in Luke 3:23-38. Taken at face value, there appears to be a problem. The
names referred to do not match. But this problem is easily resolved when it is taken into
consideration that one list is obviously calculated through Jesus' legal father, Joseph
(traditionally the genealogy would be traced through the father's line), while because
Jesus is God's Son physically and does not have a natural father (Matt. 1:25 speaks of
Joseph taking Mary as a wife; "...and he kept her a virgin until she gave birth to a Son;
and He called His name Jesus.") the list in Luke is traced back through Jesus' mother
Mary's line. By necessity these lists would vary, at least in the immediate ancestry.
Both,
13 Third, source reliability attests to the Bible's validity. As we have seen, the Jewish faith,
the Israelites of today, and the Christians both consider what the Christians call the Old
Testament as God's Holy word. Since the foundation of Christianity by Christ at about
A.D. 30 to the present the Jews have had their Hebrew copies of the Scriptures, Old
Testament, and Christians have had their copies (Hebrew, Greek, Latin, and eventually
English) as a rule separate from each other, (since the two groups are opposed in beliefs);
yet today the Jewish and the Christian copies are the same, word for word. We have
here in Christianity an amazing example that has taken place in history of a system like
the business accounting ledger system, a system which acts as a verifying record in a
business. In business accounting, in order to assure accurate record keeping, for purposes
of elimination of error and/or dishonesty on the part of a clerk, the ledger is kept as a
record to maintain and double check the accuracy of the other accountancy books. This
is the same principle we see here with the Old Testament of the Bible! The Jews of
Judaism (non-Christians) have themselves had a multitude of copies of the Old
Testament for the last 2,000 years. Regarding these copies of their Bible as God's Holy
word, they would never by any means allow people of another belief, such as Christians
(or anyone else), to come in and change any parts of their Bible (say, for example, to
rewrite a few prophecies of the coming messiah so that they might match up with the
actual events of Christ's life - although, importantly, the concept of this type of behavior
clearly has not been warranted by the founders of Christianity). They have for 2,000
years kept their Bible secure from any possible tampering of people of other beliefs.
This Jewish Bible, which we have in existence today, is in a sense a ledger for the
Christian Old Testament (and of course, the Christian Old Testament is a ledger for
the Jewish Scriptures as well). And guess what: A perfect match! The Christian
Old Testament and the Jewish Bible are the same, word for word! The Jewish Bible
demonstrates the Christian Old Testament to be an exact account of the Scriptures,
complete with messianic prophecies, back to the days before Christ; the Christian Old
Testament is a remarkably reliable document; the Christians have not changed or altered
the Old Testament in the least through these 2,000 years, but have faithfully preserved it
complete even through the various language translations of the manuscripts: Perfectly
accurate through the language translations, perfectly preserved through time. And as
14 Turning to the New Testament, when we compare source reliability of the New
Testament documents with the source reliability of other documents of antiquity, we find
that the case for New Testament reliability; its accuracy to the original authors' texts, is
phenomenal, in fact, unparalleled! "There are 5,300 known Greek manuscripts of the
New Testament...No other document of antiquity even begins to approach such numbers
and attestation. The Iliad by Homer is second with only 643 manuscripts that still
15 Fourth, the Bible's reputation and track record as being a flawless source for historical
and geographical data of the ancient Middle East and even the world attests to its
validity. This is crucial: To this date, the Bible has always proven to be correct
regarding historical figures, events, and geographic locations, whether pertaining
directly to Israel or to a foreign historical figure (such as a king) or place.
Occasionally archaeologists or historians are unable to locate or verify the existence of a
place or person reported in the Bible, or they make discoveries which appear to refute or
contradict the Bible, but what always happens is that given time, as new information
surfaces, the Bible is shown to be correct. A perfect and very recent example, and one of
countless examples, of where the validity of the Bible has been pessimistically
questioned and then vindicated as new evidence emerged is demonstrated in the
following article quoted in entirety from Time Magazine, 16 Aug., 1993 edition: "The
Bible says David slew Goliath and went on to found a dynasty that ruled the ancient land
of Israel. But no corroborating evidence for the story ever surfaced - until now [1993].
An Israeli archaeologist has uncovered an inscription near the Syrian border that refers to
the House of David. Biblical scholars have termed the find 'sensational.'"
29 David is a
prominent figure in the Bible; he wrote many of the Psalms, and is spoken of in, for
example, I and II Samuel, I Chronicles, and the New Testament. Yet somehow up to
1993 there was no other known evidence of his existence outside the manuscripts of the
Bible. Was the Bible wrong, or, alternately, was the Bible teaching a myth? As we see
above from Time Magazine, and as is always the case regarding Biblical data, not on
your life! Notably, it has also been published that about the same time as the above
discovery of the inscription (early 1990’s) there was actually an additional discovery of a
reference to the House of David on an ancient artifact called the Moabite Stone.
30 Nelson
Glueck, a Jewish archaeologist, and one of the world's leading archaeologists, said, "No
archaeological discovery has ever controverted a Biblical reference."
31 Literary scholars, Christian and non-Christian, recognize the Bible as an authoritative and
accurate body, at least historically, relying on it as an accurate record of what people said
and did and when, what events occurred and when; and geographically, accurately
supplying locations of places, things, and events. For example, if we look up "James" in
the Encyclopaedia Britannica’s Micropaedia (condensed encyclopaedia) and go to
"James, Son of Zebedee" (one of Christ's twelve original disciples), the Encyclopaedia
Britannica tells us he was born in Galilee, and died c. A.D. 44 in Jerusalem, his
16 Fifth, the validity of the Bible is affirmed by its outstanding characteristics of the content
of its teachings. Actually, just about every point we have discussed above could be
considered an 'outstanding characteristic' of the Bible, something which clearly separates
it from ordinary literature and demonstrates its superiority and/or phenomenal reliability
and accuracy. Additionally, however, since the Bible claims of itself to be God's word
given to men so that we can believe in God (Rom. 10:17; "Faith comes from hearing, and
hearing by the word of Christ"), and so that believers can know God (Jesus said in Jn.
8:31b,32; "If you abide in My word, then you are truly My disciples, and you shall know
17 Finally, the Bible says of itself that it is accurate and without error, being God's word.
And as we have seen from the above powerful confirmations of the Bible's validity and
trustworthiness, it is not only proper to take a look at what the Bible says about itself, it
would be intellectually unfair and improper not to do so. Paul says, "All Scripture is
inspired by God, and profitable for training, reproof, and correction; that the man of God
may be adequate, equipped for every good work," II Tim.3:16,17. While physically
written by men, all Scripture is authored by God's Spirit. Peter says, "But know this first
of all, that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one's own interpretation, for no
prophecy was ever an act of human will, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from
God," II Pet. 1:20,21. As God's word, it follows that the Bible would demonstrate the
character of God. Does God lie? According to the Bible, no: "Also the Glory of Israel
will not lie or change His mind; for He is not a man, that He should change His mind," I
Sam. 15:29. Does God make mistakes? According to the Bible, no; "For I proclaim the
name of the Lord; ascribe greatness to our God! The Rock! His work is perfect, for all
His ways are just; a God of faithfulness and without injustice, righteous and upright is
He," Deut. 32:3,4. God's works are perfect; he does not make mistakes, and he does not
lie, therefore we can depend on his word as the truth. How did Jesus regard God's word
in the Old Testament? When debating with the Jews, Jesus quoted Ps. 82:6 in the Old
Testament and then asserted about it, "...the Scripture cannot be broken" (Jn. 10:35b),
indicating that God's word is without error. When Jesus was tempted, he continually
18 The Golden Rule and the Ten Commandments above clearly demonstrate the Bible to be
authoritative in area of moral and spiritual, or God-focused teachings. With regard to the
depth and superiority of the Bible's teachings, however, those two examples only "scratch
the surface," as will be seen in further examination of the depth and superiority of Christ
vs. the other teachers, in a separate section. Nevertheless, keeping in mind these superior
teachings, as well as the Bible's perfect historical and geographical record (evidenced
most strongly in the existence today of the Jews and Christians, as well as its record of
being a flawless source for scholars), its excellent source reliability, its consistent internal
agreement (40 authors over a period of 1500+ years, and yet virtually no contradictions
in teaching or data), and its own testimony of itself as being true and without error, what
statement are we able to make regarding the validity and accuracy of the Bible? We can
be sure of the Bible and its validity; we can have strongest confidence possible in the
Bible and that what it says is the truth. The Bible is valid, the Bible is accurate, it is
"model" as far as its demonstrated ability at passing our tests for literary reliability. This
confidence in the validity and trustworthiness of the Bible is a crucial foundation
necessary as we examine the further claims and assertions of the Bible. We are now able to proceed with examining prophecies of Christ of the Old Testament
and their fulfillment by Christ in the New Testament. Similarly, we will also look at
types of Christ from the Old Testament (a type being a 'model;' a person or thing which is
a foreshadow of a person or thing to come). (It should be noted that fulfilled prophecy is
itself an astounding confirmation of the above discussed validity of the Bible; i.e., God's
word is shown to be true as prophecies years later accurately take place just as God's
word said they would.) As we begin to see from these prophecies how Christ is truly
different from other religious leaders, which is our primary goal here, we will also see
some amazing things that Christ went through for us. Jesus taught that His primary
mission here in this world was to give His life for us: Mk. 10:45; "For even the Son of
Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for many."
But it was more than this one act that he went through for us. He suffered rejection,
humiliation, physical abuse and torture ("So His appearance was marred beyond any
man," Is. 52:14b), all of his friends denied him, he was considered forsaken by God, and
finally, crucified. And yet he knew ahead of time it was going to happen, and he went
through it anyway, out of love for us. Jesus said to his disciples on the night of his
betrayal, "Greater love has no one than this, that one lay down his life for his friends," Jn.
15:13. He has demonstrated his love for us. It is up to us to respond. The following list
will give first the nature of the prophecy, then the Old Testament Scripture containing the
prophecy itself, and then at least one New Testament fulfillment by Christ of that
19 Fulfilled Prophecies by Christ in the Bible: The Messiah, a descendant of Abraham, is said to be for the whole world: Gen. 22:18; "And in your seed shall all the families of the earth will be blessed,
because you have obeyed my word." Fulfillment by Christ: Acts 13:47; "For thus the Lord has commanded us, 'I have placed you as a light
for the Gentiles [non-Jews by natural birth], that you should bring salvation to
the end of the earth.'" Gal. 3:16,28,29; "Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed.
He does not say, 'and to seeds,' as referring to many, but rather to one, 'and
to your seed,' that is, Christ...There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither
slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in
Christ Jesus. And if you belong to Christ, you are Abraham's offspring,
heirs according to the promise." A great prophet like Moses is coming: Deut. 18:15; "The Lord will raise up a prophet like me from among you, from among
your countrymen, and you shall listen to him." Fulfillment by Christ: Jn. 5:45,46; "Do not think I will accuse you before the Father; the one who
accuses you is Moses, in whom you have set your hope. For if you believed
Moses, you would believe me; for he wrote of Me." Lk. 24:27; "And beginning with Moses and the prophets, He explained all things concerning Himself in all the Scriptures." The Messiah to be born in Bethlehem: Mic. 5:2; But as for you, Bethlehem, Ephrathah, too little to be among the clans for
Judah, from you One will go forth for Me to be a ruler in Israel. His goings forth are
from long ago; of eternity." Fulfillment by Christ: Luke 2:8,9a,10,11,15-17; "and in the same region there were some shepherds
staying out in the fields keeping watch over their flocks by night...and an angel of
the Lord suddenly appeared to them,...And the angel said to them, 'Do not be
afraid, for behold, I bring you good news of a great joy which shall be for all the
people; for today in the city of David has been born for you a Savior, who is
Christ the Lord...And it came about when the angels had gone away from them
into heaven, that the shepherds began saying to one another, 'Let us go straight to
20 The Messiah (Christ) will be born of a virgin, and will be known as 'God with us.' Is. 7:14 "Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: Behold, a virgin will be with
child and bear a son, and she will call His name Immanuel." ('Immanuel' is
translated 'God with us'!) Fulfillment by Christ: Lk. 1:26,27,31,32,34,35: "Now in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent
from God to a city in Galilee, called Nazareth, to a virgin engaged to a man
whose name was Joseph, of the descendants of David; and the virgin's name was
Mary. And coming in he said 'Hail favored one! The Lord is with you....Behold,
you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall name him Jesus.
He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord will
give Him the throne of His father David; and He will reign over the house of
Jacob forever, and his kingdom will have no end. And Mary said to the angel,
'How can this be, since I am a virgin?' And the angel answered and said to her,
'The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will
overshadow you; for that reason the holy offspring shall be called the Son of
God.'" The Messiah will be called God, and there will be no end to his reign. Is. 9:6,7; "For a child will be born to us, a son will be given to us,...and His name shall be
called Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace, and there
will be no end to the increase of His government or of peace, on the throne of David and
over His kingdom." Fulfillment by Christ: Jn. 20:28; "And Thomas answered and said to Him, 'My Lord and My
God!'" Heb. 1:1-4; "God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many
portions and in many ways, in these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom
He appointed heir of all things, and through whom He made the world. And He
is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and
upholds all things by the word of His power. When He had made purification
of sins, He sat down at the right hand of Majesty on high; having become much
better than the angels, as He has inherited a more excellent name than they." Rev. 1:5a,17b,18; "...Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the first-born of the dead,
the ruler of the kings of the earth...'Do not be afraid; I am the first and the
last, and the living One; I was dead, and behold, I am alive again
forevermore, and I have the keys of death and Hades.'" 21 The Messiah's mission will be to bring good news and proclaim freedom to the captives. Is. 61:1,2a; "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because the Lord has anointed Me to
bring good news to the afflicted; He has sent Me to bind up the brokenhearted, to
proclaim liberty to the captives, and freedom to the prisoners; to proclaim the
favorable year of the Lord...' Fulfillment by Christ: Mk 1:15; "He came...saying, 'The time is fulfilled, the kingdom of God is at
hand; repent and believe the gospel." Mk. 2:9-12a; "'Which is easier, to say to the paralytic, 'Your sins are forgiven,' or
to say, "Arise, take up your pallet, and walk"? But in order that you may know
that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins,' He said to the
paralytic, 'I say to you, rise, take up your pallet, and go home.' And he
rose..." Mk. 5:28,29,34; "For she thought, 'If I just touch His garments, I shall get well.'
And immediately the flow of blood was dried up; and she felt in her body that she
was healed of her affliction...And He said to her, 'Daughter, your faith has made
you well; go in peace, and be healed of your affliction." Jn. 8:4,7b,9a,10b,11; "...they said to Him, 'Teacher, this woman has been
caught in adultery, in the very act.'...He said to them, 'He among you who is
without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her.' And when they heard it,
they began to go out, one by one... Jesus said to her, 'Woman where are they?
Did no one accuse you?' And she said, 'No one, Lord.' And Jesus said, 'Neither
do I condemn you; go your way, and from now on sin no more.'" Mk. 10:45; "For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for many." The Messiah will come humble, on a donkey. Zech. 9:9; "Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion! Shout in triumph O daughter of
Jerusalem! Behold, your king is coming to you, He is just and endowed with salvation,
humble and mounted on a donkey..." Fulfillment by Christ: Mk. 11:7,9; "And they brought the colt to Jesus, and put their garments on it; and
He sat upon it...And those who went before, and those who followed after were
crying out, 'Hosanna! Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord!’" The Messiah will inaugurate a new covenant. Jer. 31:31-34; "'Behold, the days are coming,' declares the Lord, 'when I will make a
new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, not like the
22 Fulfillment by Christ: Lk. 22:19,20; "And having taken some bread, when He had given thanks, He
broke it and gave it to them, saying, 'This is My body, which is given for you; do
this in remembrance of Me.' And in the same way He took the cup after they
had eaten, saying 'This cup which is poured out for you is the new covenant
in My blood.'" The Messiah, the founder and foundation of the new covenant, will be rejected by the
leaders of his own people. Ps. 118:22; "The stone which the builders rejected has become the chief cornerstone; this
is the Lord's doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes." Fulfillment by Christ: Jn. 1:10-12; "He was in the world, and though the world was made through Him,
the world did not receive Him. He came to His own, and those who were His
own did not receive him. But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right
to become children of God, even to those who believe in His name..." Heb. 9:13-15a; "For if the blood of goats and bulls and the ashes of a heifer
sprinkling those who have been defiled, sanctify for the cleansing of flesh, how
much more will blood of Christ who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself
without blemish to God, cleanse your conscience from dead works to serve the
living God? For this reason He is the mediator of a new covenant..." The Messiah will be betrayed by thirty pieces of silver, which will be given to the potter. Zech. 11:12,13; "And I said to them, 'If it is good in your sight, give Me my wages, but if
not, never mind!' So they weighed out thirty shekels of silver as My wages. Then the
Lord said to me, 'Throw it to the potter, that magnificent price at which I was valued by
them...'" Fulfillment by Christ: Matt. 26:14-16; "Then one of the twelve, named Judas Iscariot, went to the chief
priests, and said, 'What are you willing to give to me to deliver him up to you?'
And they weighed out to him thirty pieces of silver.' And from then on he began
looking for a good opportunity to betray Him." 23 The Messiah will be struck down, his followers will desert him. Zech. 13:7; "'Awake, O sword, against My shepherd, and against the man, My associate,'
declares the Lord of hosts, 'Strike the shepherd, that the sheep may be scattered, and I
will turn My hand against the little ones.'" Fulfillment by Christ: Matt 26:55,56; "At that time Jesus said to the multitudes, 'Have you come out
with swords and clubs to arrest me as though I were a robber? Every day I used
to sit in the temple teaching and you did not seize Me. But all this has taken place
that the Scriptures of the prophets may be fulfilled.' Then all the disciples left
Him and fled." The Messiah will be mistreated. Is. 50:6; "'I gave my back to those who strike Me, and My cheeks to those who pluck
My beard; I did not cover My face from humiliation and spitting.'" Fulfillment by Christ: Mk. 15:16-18; "And the soldiers took Him away to the palace (that is, the
Praetorium), and they called together the whole Roman cohort. And they dressed
Him up in purple, and after weaving a crown of thorns, they put it on Him; and
they began to acclaim Him, 'Hail, King of the Jews!' And they kept beating His
head with a reed, and spitting at Him, and kneeling and bowing before
Him." Matt. 27:26; "Then he released Barabbas for them, but Jesus he scourged
[whipped] and delivered over to be crucified." The following prophecies, until otherwise cited, are exclusively from the two Old
Testament chapters of Isaiah 53 and Psalm 22. Both of these chapters in their entirety are
considered to be Messianic prophecies, i.e., prophecies of Christ, because of their
predictive nature and the way in which their numerous descriptions and events were
precisely fulfilled by Christ. Additionally, Christ quoted the first phrase of Psalm 22
when He was on the cross, and Ps. 22:16b says, "They have pierced My hands and
My feet." Psalm 22 was written by David between 1100 and 1000 B.C., or about 1100
years Before Christ! And Isaiah was written between 740 and 700 B.C. All of Isaiah
53 is included below, as well as key passages of Psalm 22. The Messiah will be acquainted with grief and sorrow, and will be despised and rejected,
considered forsaken of God: Is. 53:1-4; "Who has believed our message? And to whom has the arm of the Lord been
revealed? For He grew up before Him like a tender shoot, and like a root out of parched
ground; He had no stately form or majesty that we should look upon Him, nor appearance
that we should be attracted to Him. He was despised and forsaken of men; a man of
sorrows, and acquainted with grief; like one from whom men hide their face, He
was despised, and we did not esteem Him. Surely our griefs He Himself bore, and
24 Fulfillment by Christ: Lk. 22:63; "And the men who were holding Jesus in custody were mocking
Him and beating Him, and they blindfolded Him and were asking Him, saying,
'Prophecy, who is the one who hit You?'" Lk. 23:33-37; "And when they came to the place called The Skull, there they
crucified Him and the criminals, one on the right, and the other one on the left.
But Jesus was saying, 'Father, forgive them; for they do not know what they are
doing.' And they cast lots, dividing up His garments among themselves. And the
people stood by, looking on. And even the rulers were sneering at Him,
saying, 'He saved others, let Him save Himself, if this is the Christ of God,
His chosen One.' And the soldiers also mocked Him, coming up to Him,
offering Him sour wine, and saying, 'If You are the King of the Jews, save
Yourself!'" Jn. 11:32b-35; "Therefore, when Mary came where Jesus was, she saw Him, and
fell at His feet, saying to Him, 'Lord, if You had been here my brother would
not have died.' When Jesus therefore saw her weeping, and the Jews who
came with her, also weeping, He was deeply moved in his spirit, and was
troubled, and said, 'Where have you laid him?' They said to Him, 'Lord, come
and see.' Jesus wept...And Jesus raised his eyes, and said, 'Father, I thank You
that you heard Me...' And when He had said these things, He cried out with a
loud voice, 'Lazarus, come forth.' He who had died came forth, bound hand
and foot with wrappings; his face was wrapped around with a cloth. Jesus said to
them, 'Unbind him, and let him go.' The Messiah will be despised by and a reproach of the people, and considered forsaken
by God: Ps. 22:1,2,6-8; "My God, my God, why have You forsaken Me? Far from My
deliverance are the words of My groaning. O my God, I cry by day, but You do not
answer, and by night, but I have no rest...But I am a worm, and not a man, a reproach of
men, and despised by the people. All who see Me sneer at Me; they separate the lip, they
wag the head, saying, 'Commit Yourself to the Lord, let Him deliver Him, let Him
rescue Him, because He delights in Him.'" Fulfillment by Christ: Matt. 27:39,43; "And those who were passing by were hurling abuse at Him,
wagging their heads,...`He trusts in God, let Him deliver Him now, if He
takes pleasure in Him; for He said, 'I am the Son of God.'" The Messiah will suffer abuse and will have his hands and feet pierced, his garments will
be taken, and lots will be cast for them: 25 Ps. 22:16-18; "For dogs have surrounded Me; a band of evildoers has encompassed Me;
they pierced My hands and My feet. I can count all My bones. They look, they stare at
Me; they divide My garments among them, and for My clothing they cast lots." Fulfillment by Christ: Jn. 19:23,24; "The soldiers, therefore, when they had crucified Jesus, took His
outer garments, and made four parts, a part to every soldier and also a tunic;
now the tunic was seamless, woven in one piece. They said therefore to one
another, 'Let us not tear it, but cast lots for it, to decide whose it shall be;' that
the Scripture might be fulfilled, 'They divided My outer garments among them,
and for My clothing they cast lots.'" We have gone our own way, but the Messiah is to be a sacrifice for our sins: Is. 53:5-6; "But He was pierced through for our transgressions, He was crushed for
our iniquities; the chastening for our well being fell upon Him, and by His scourging
we are healed. All of us like sheep have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own
way, but the Lord caused the iniquity of us all to fall on Him." Fulfillment by Christ: Jn. 19:17,18b; "They took Jesus therefore, and He went out, bearing His own
cross, to the place called the Place of the Skull, which is called in Hebrew
Golgotha. There they crucified Him..." I Jn. 4:10; "In this is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us, and
sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins." I Pet. 2:24,25; "And He Himself bore our sins in His body on the cross, that
we might die to sin and live to righteousness; for by His wounds you were
healed. For you were continually straying like sheep, but now you have
returned to the Shepherd and Guardian of your souls." The Messiah will be silent before his accusers, his burial will at first be along with
transgressors, but will have to do with a rich man ultimately, and he will be without sin: Is. 53:7-9; "He was oppressed and He was afflicted, yet He did not open His mouth;
like a lamb that is led to the slaughter, and a sheep that is silent before its shearers, so He
did not open His mouth. By oppression and judgment He was taken away; and as for this
generation, who considered that he was cut off out of the land of the living, for the
transgression of My people to whom the stroke was due? His grave was assigned to be
with wicked men, yet with a rich man in His death; although He had done no violence,
nor was there any deceit in His mouth." Fulfillment by Christ: Jn. 19:8-9; "When Pilate therefore heard this statement, he was the more afraid;
and he entered the Praetorium again, and said to Jesus, 'Where are you
from?' But Jesus gave him no answer." 26 Mk. 15:27; "And they crucified two robbers with Him, one on his right, and one
on His left." Matt. 27:57-60; "And when it was evening, there came a rich man from
Arimathea, named Joseph, who himself had also become a disciple of Jesus. This
man came to Pilate and asked for the body of Jesus. Then Pilate ordered it to be
given over to him. And Joseph took the body and wrapped it in clean linen cloth,
and laid it in his own new tomb, which he had hewn out in the rock; and he rolled
a large stone against the entrance." Jn. 8:46, (Jesus speaking); "'Which one of you convicts Me of sin? If I speak
the truth, why do you not believe Me?'" Heb. 4:15; "For we do not have a high priest who cannot sympathize with our
weaknesses, but one who has been tempted in all things as we are, yet
without sin." I Pet. 2:21-23; "For you have been called for this purpose, since Christ also
suffered for you, leaving you and example for you to follow in His steps, who
committed no sin, nor was any deceit found in His mouth; and while being
reviled, did not revile in return; while suffering, He uttered no threats, but
kept entrusting Himself to Him who judges righteously..." Because the Messiah is to sacrifice himself even to the death, the Lord will prosper him
and reward him (the resurrection in view here): Is.53:10-12; "But the Lord was pleased to crush Him, putting Him to grief; If He would
render Himself as a guilt offering, He will see His offspring, He will prolong His days,
and the good pleasure of the Lord will prosper in His hand. As a result of the anguish of
His soul, He will see it and be satisfied; by His knowledge the Righteous One, my
Servant, will justify many, as He will bear their iniquities. Therefore I will allot
Him a portion with the great, and He will divide the booty with the strong; Because
He poured out Himself to death, and was numbered with the transgressors; yet he
Himself bore the sin of many, and interceded for the transgressors." Fulfillment by Christ: Phil.2:5-11; "Have this attitude in yourselves which was also in Christ Jesus, who,
although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a thing
to be grasped, but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond servant and being
made in the likeness of men. And, being found in appearance as a man, He
humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a
cross. Therefore God also highly exalted Him and bestowed on Him the
name which is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should
bow, of those who are in heaven, and on earth, and under the earth, and that
27 Rev. 1:5b,6; "To Him [Jesus] who loves us, and has released us from our sins by
His blood, and has made us to be a kingdom, priests to His God and Father; to
Him be the glory and the dominion forever and ever. Amen." The Messiah will rise from the dead: Ps. 16:10; "For You will not abandon my soul to Sheol, nor will You allow Your Holy
One to undergo decay." Fulfillment by Christ: Matt. 28:5-7; "And the angel answered and said to the women, 'Do not be afraid,
for I know that you are looking for Jesus, who has been crucified. He is not here,
for He has risen, just as He said. Come, see the place where He was lying. And
go quickly and tell His disciples that He has risen from the dead; behold, He
is going before you into Galilee, and there you will see Him; behold, I have told
you." The Messiah will be raised on the third day: Hos. 6:2; "He will raise us up on the third day, that we may live before Him." Fulfillment by Christ: Luke 24:15-32; "And it came about that while they were conversing and
discussing, Jesus Himself approached, and began traveling with them. But
their eyes were prevented from recognizing Him. And He said to them, 'What
are these words that you are exchanging with one another as you are walking?'
And they stood still, looking sad. And one of them, named Cleopas, answered
and said to Him, 'Are you the only one visiting Jerusalem and unaware of
these things which happened here in these days?' And He said to them,
'What things?' And they said to Him, 'The things about Jesus the Nazarene,
who was a prophet mighty in deed and word in the sight of God and all the
people, and how the chief priests and our rulers delivered Him up to the
sentence of death, and crucified Him. But we were hoping that it was He
who was going to redeem Israel. Indeed, besides all this, it is the third day
since these things happened. But also some of our women amazed us. When
they were at the tomb early in the morning, and did not find His body they came,
saying they had also seen a vision of angels, who said that He was alive. And
some of those who were with us went to the tomb, and found it exactly as the
women had said; but Him they did not see.' And He said to them, 'O foolish men
and slow of heart to believe in all that the prophets have spoken! Was it not
necessary for the Christ to suffer these things and to enter into His glory?' And
beginning with Moses and all the prophets, He explained to them the things
concerning Himself in all the Scriptures. And they approached the village where
they were going, and He acted as though He would go farther. And they urged
28 The Messiah will have the ultimate victory over all enemies, and his kingdom will not be
destroyed!: Dan. 2:44; "And in the days of those kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom
which will never be destroyed, and that kingdom will not be left for another people;
it will crush and put an end to all these kingdoms, but it will itself endure forever." Fulfillment by Christ: Rev. 11:15b; "The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our
Lord, and of His Christ; and He will reign forever and ever." Rev. 20:10; "And the devil who deceived them was thrown into the lake of
fire and brimstone, where the beast and false prophet are also; and they will be
tormented day and night forever and ever." Rev. 21:6,7; "And He said to me, 'It is done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the
beginning and the end. I will give to the one who thirsts from the spring of the
water of life without cost. He who overcomes shall inherit these things, and I will
be his God, and he will be My son.'" The Messiah, the Son of Man, will have an everlasting dominion for every people,
nation, and language: Dan. 7:13,14; "I kept on looking in the night visions, and behold, with the clouds of
heaven One like a Son of Man was coming, and He came up to the Ancient of Days and
was presented before Him. And to Him was given dominion, glory and a kingdom,
that all the peoples, nations, and men of every language might serve Him. His
dominion is an everlasting dominion which will not pass away; His kingdom is one
which will not be destroyed." Fulfillment by Christ: Mk. 14:61b,62; "...Again the high priest was questioning Him, and saying to Him,
'Are You the Christ, the Son of the Blessed One?' And Jesus said, 'I am, and you
shall see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of power, and coming with
the clouds of heaven.'" Rev. 7:9, a vision of Heaven given to John; "After these things I looked, and
behold, a great multitude which no one could count, from every nation and
all tribes and peoples and tongues, standing before the throne and before the
29 The date of the Messiah's arrival is given in the Old Testament: Dan.9:25; "So you are to know and discern that from the issuing of a decree to restore
and rebuild Jerusalem until Messiah the Prince there will be seven weeks and sixty-two
weeks; it will be built again, with plaza and moat, even in times of distress." Fulfillment by Christ: This prophecy of Daniel was written in 530 B.C. Messiah the Prince refers to
Christ. About 72 years after the book of Daniel was written, in 458 B.C., King
Artaxerxes issued a decree, appointing Nehemiah to restore Jerusalem
36 (Ezra
7:7,ff). Taking each 'week,' or 7 days, to symbolize 7 years in this passage (the
precedent in the Bible for this 'weeks of years' symbolism, where a 7 day week
symbolizes 7 years, comes from Lev. 25:8), the 7 weeks + 62 weeks, or 69 weeks
total given in the passage would be a total of 69x7, or 483 years. According to
the passage, the time of the issuing of the decree to restore Jerusalem, until the
arrival of Christ (Messiah the Prince) would be 483 years from 458 B.C., which
would be in the A.D. 25-26, the time of the commencement of Christ's
ministry on earth! The Messiah provides salvation as a free gift!: Is. 55:1,2; "Ho! Everyone who thirsts, come to the waters; and you who have no
money, come, buy, and eat. Come, buy wine and milk without money and without
cost. Why do you spend money for what is not bread, and your wages for what does not
satisfy? Listen carefully to Me, and eat what is good, and delight yourself in abundance." Fulfillment by Christ: Rom. 6:23; "For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal
life in Christ Jesus our Lord." Rev. 22:13,16,17,20,21; "'I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the
last, the beginning and the end...I, Jesus, have sent My angel to testify to you
these things for the churches. I am the root and offspring of David, the bright
morning star.' And the Spirit and the bride say 'Come.' And let the one who hears
say, 'Come.' And let the one who is thirsty come; let the one who wishes take
the water of life without cost." Rev. 21:6,7; "And he said to me, 'It is done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the
beginning and the end. I will give to the one who thirsts from the spring of the
water of life without cost. He who overcomes shall inherit these things, and I will
be his God, and he will be My son.'" 30 Fulfilled Types: In Genesis 22, Isaac is a type of Christ. God has promised Abraham that from him he
will make a great nation through his son, Isaac. God now tests his faith in this promise
by asking Abraham to sacrifice his son as an offering: Gen. 22:1,6-13; "Now it came about that after these things, that God tested Abraham and
said to him, 'Abraham!' And Abraham said, 'Here I am.' And He said, 'Take now your
son, your only son, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as
a burnt offering on one of the mountains which I tell you.'...And Abraham took the wood
of the burnt offering and laid it on his son, and he took in his hand the fire and the knife.
So the two of them walked on together. And Isaac spoke to Abraham his father and said,
'My father!' And he said, 'Here I am, my son!' And he said, 'Behold, the fire and the
wood, but where is the lamb for the burnt offering?' And Abraham said, 'God will
provide for Himself the lamb for the burnt offering, my son.' So the two of them on
walked together. Then they came to the place of which God had told him; and Abraham
built the altar there, and arranged the wood, and bound his son Isaac, and laid him on the
wood. And Abraham stretched out his hand, and took the knife to slay his son. But an
angel of the Lord called to him from heaven and said, 'Abraham, Abraham!' And he said,
'Here I am.' And He said, 'Do not stretch your hand against the lad, and do nothing to
him, for now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only
son, from Me.' Then Abraham raised his eyes and looked, and behold, behind him a ram
caught in the thicket by his horns; and Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him
up as a burnt offering in the place of his son." Analysis and Fulfillment by Christ: Isaac was a type of Christ: Just as Abraham, a father, offers his only son Isaac as
a sacrifice, so God the Father offered his only Son Jesus as the sacrifice for our
sins: "He who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all, how
will He not also with Him freely give us all things?" Rom. 8:32; "...but He,
having offered one sacrifice for sins for all time; sat down at the right hand of
God," Heb.10:12. The lamb is a type of Christ: Looking at the text we notice that Abraham said to
his son, "God will provide for Himself a lamb..." John the Baptist in Jn. 1:29 says
of Jesus, "Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sins of the world!" God
fulfilled Abraham's word by providing Jesus, the ultimate lamb of sacrifice for all
mankind. The ram was a type of Christ: We see that the ram that was used as the actual
offering in the Genesis narrative was caught in the thicket by its horns. This can
be taken as a secondary type of Christ, in that Christ had on his head a crown of
thicket, or thorns, by the soldiers just before his offering up of himself on the
cross! "And the soldiers wove a crown of thorns and put it on His head, and
arranged Him in a purple robe," Jn. 19:2. In Exodus 12, the Passover lamb is a type of Christ, and the Passover itself is a type of
the new covenant inaugurated by Christ and symbolized by the Lord's Supper; the new
31 Analysis and Fulfillment by Christ: The Passover lamb was a type of Christ: Every house in Egypt where a lamb
was sacrificed in the manner prescribed by God escaped the judgement of
the death of the first-born from the plague. Because by faith the Israelites
offered the lambs, God accepted the lambs as symbolic sacrifices to him, and
therefore accepted the Israelites; and the believing Israelites were saved from the
death and destruction of the plague. In the new covenant inaugurated by Christ in
the New Testament, Christ is the sacrificial lamb of God which was offered up
by God himself for our sins, and which we, too, must personally acknowledge
by faith as the one time sacrifice for our sins. As we place our trust in Christ
the Lamb of God as the sacrifice for our sins, we will be saved from the judgment
of eternal death and saved to eternal life; "He who believes in Him is not judged;
he who does not believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in
the name of the only Son of God," Jn. 3:18. The Egyptians were judged already,
before the plague had even arrived; but the Israelites were not judged because of
their faith in the lamb of God, a type of the true Lamb of God, Jesus! The Passover was a type of the new covenant: Further confirming the above
concept of the Passover lamb as a type of Christ, the New Testament tells how
Christ established the Lord's Supper, which first took place on the eve of
Passover: "And He said to them, 'I have earnestly desired to share this Passover
with you before I suffer,'" Lk. 22:15. "And while they were eating, He took some
bread, and after a blessing He broke it; and gave it to them, and said, 'Take it; this
is My body.' And He took the cup, and when He had given thanks, He gave it to
them; and they all drank from it. And He said to them, 'This is My blood of the
covenant, which is to be shed on behalf of many,'" Mk. 14:22-24. As we stated,
32 The blood on the door posts was a type of the method of God's sacrificial offer for
our sins: In the Exodus account above God tells the Israelites to put some blood
on the two door posts and the lintel (crossbeam). Two swaths on the sides and a
swath across the top would cross each other at the corners where they meet,
forming a cross on each side of the doorway. Therefore each Israelite family had
the sign of the cross on each side of the doorway of their house, foreshadowing
the cross of Christ at His crucifixion. Muslim Claims of Fulfilled Prophecies by Muhammad in the Bible As Christians claim, and as we have seen evidence for above, that prophets of the Old
Testament prophesied of the coming of Christ, and that Christ did in fact fulfill these, so
Muslims scholars claim that Old Testament prophets prophesied of the coming of
Muhammad, that he would be a prophet of God, and that Muhammad also fulfilled these.
These claims of the Muslims will first of all be dealt with in this paper because it is our
goal is to see how Christ is different than these other teachers, and therefore by
examining the Muslim claims of prophecy we can show that they are without substance,
while those of Christ are quite substantial, and second of all they will be dealt with
thoroughly because once these claims are examined it becomes so utterly apparent that
they are totally in error as to make it within the scope of this paper to completely refute
and put to
33 With regard to every one of these supposed prophecies and/or Bible verses claimed by
Muslims to be prophecies of Muhammad, either one or more of the following apply: 1)
they have already been fulfilled in a more precise manner by Christ; 2) they are so vague
and inspecific as to be applicable to just about anyone (contrary to what we have seen in
the above prophecies of Christ), or are simply references to people and places and cannot
really even be construed to be prophetic; or, 3) are completely misinterpreted. Muslims present, as part of their argument for a true Biblical foundation and basis for
Islam and its beliefs, a didactic argument regarding Abraham's son Ishmael, stating that
the descendants of Ishmael (in a large part, modern-day Arabia) as God's nation of
promise from the Old Testament in addition to Israel. However, there is no biblical
ground for this argument; in fact, the Bible clearly teaches the opposite, that only Israel
was God's chosen nation. To review, as stated at a previous point in this paper, Abraham
had been given a promise from God to be blessed, to be a great nation through a son from
his own body, and that through this promised nation, to somehow be a blessing to all the
nations of the earth; Gen. 12:2,3b: "'And I will make you a great nation, and I will bless
you, and make your name great; and so you shall be a blessing;...and in you all the
families of the earth shall be blessed.'" Muhammad's and the Muslims' didactic argument
given above, that according to the Bible Isaac's descendants Israel, and Ishmael's
descendants (now) Arabia, were both called as nations of God's above promise to
Abraham, can be examined first of all by looking at the Bible text itself; it says, "a great
nation," ‘a’ as in one; the promise is singular regarding the number of nations. In Gen.
17, God then makes it abundantly clear through which son will be the promise; his
everlasting covenant with Abraham is through Isaac, as can be seen here, as God first
initiates the covenant with Abraham, then specifies through whom it will be established:
"Now when Abram was ninety-nine years old, the Lord appeared to Abram and said to
him, 'I am God Almighty; walk before Me and be blameless. And I will establish My
covenant between Me and you and I will multiply you exceedingly.' And Abram fell on
his face, and God talked with him, saying, 'As for Me, behold, My covenant is with you,
and you shall be the father of a multitude of nations. No longer shall your name be
called Abram, but your name shall be Abraham; for I will make you a father of a
multitude of nations.'...Then Abraham fell on his face and laughed, and said in his heart,
'Will a child be born to a man one hundred years old? And will Sarah, who is ninety
34 There is no room for argument of interpretation here. The Bible clearly states that it is
the descendants of Isaac, and not of Ishmael, through whom his covenant with Abraham
would be and through whom are the promises of Gen. 12. Could it be eventually
transferred over to Ishmael? Again, 'No,' as God says in v.13, this covenant with Isaac is
"for an everlasting covenant for his descendants [Israel] after him." What Muslim
scholars do here is attempt to blur this clear distinction by referring to Arabia (Ishmael's
descendants, in part) also as the "called," or "promised" nation, implying equal footing
with Israel. But if we look at the above texts, we see a vast difference. Out of love for
Abraham God says he "hears him" in his plea, and promises to make Ishmael a great
nation. However, the covenant nation, the nation of the promised blessing to "all the
families of the earth" (Gen. 12:1-3), is Israel alone. Abraham, because he was ninety-nine years old and was doubting that God is able to give him yet another son, asks that
the promise of Gen. 12 might be fulfilled through Ishmael, who was already born at that
time. In v.19, what was God's answer? 'No.' Two nations were foretold of, but only one,
biblically speaking was, or could ever be, the called covenant nation of the promise;
Israel, from Isaac. God said, "Through Isaac your seed shall be called." Ishmael, and
his descendants after him (i.e., Arabia and therefore Muhammad), did not have or
receive any kind of special calling or covenant from God, nor was one implied in the
future; in fact it was explicitly ruled out (except in the sense that, as with everyone
else, being one of the "families of the earth," God's plan was and is to bless them through
his chosen covenant nation Israel (Gen. 12:3)). Amazingly, Abraham had six more sons
after Isaac, and some of these also became great nations (the Midianites, for example,
from Abraham's son Midian)! But the fact that a nation comes from a son of Abraham
does not qualify it to be the called, covenant nation. For a nation to be "called," someone
has to "call" it. To be a "covenant" nation, someone has to establish a covenant with it.
Paul says in Rom. 9:4,5, "…Israelites [descendants of Isaac], to whom belongs the
adoption as sons, and the glory and the covenants and the giving of the Law and the
temple service and the promises, whose are the fathers, and from whom is the Christ
according to the flesh, who is over all, God blessed forever. Amen." Isaac was the only
one to be called and receive a covenant from God, and it was an everlasting covenant,
meaning that God would never revoke it; it would always be with the Israelites. What
about today, 4000 years later; is God keeping his part of the "everlasting" covenant?
Jesus said, "'This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is poured out for you,'" Lk.
22:20b; he also said, "'Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I
have not come to abolish them, but to fulfill them,'" Matt. 5:17; the covenant with the
35 Here is the good news (gospel) for Muslims and all the families of the earth: While most
of us were not born Israelites by physical ancestry, we can all be spiritual Israelites;
Muslims, Arabians, Americans, Asians, Africans, and everyone can become an heir of
36 To more firmly establish this bedrock point, that a relationship with God is, and forever
can only be, available through Christ, and that Muhammad is a false prophet and Islam is
not from the God of the Bible, we will take a brief look at the chief prophecies of
Muhammad which Muslims claim point to him in the Bible. To refute arguments that
there are biblical prophecies about Muhammad's coming and mission, we will start with
the Old Testament and move to the New Testament, examining the main verses Muslim
scholars put forth as specifically prophetic regarding Muhammad. (It is interesting to
note that Muslim scholars also point to prophecies about Muhammad in the Qu’ran
supposedly spoken by Jesus, as supportive evidence for Muhammad and his mission; but
since these prophecies were written by Muhammad (in other words, Muhammad
prophesying about himself!) - as acknowledged by Muslims - it is impossible to consider
these as acceptable evidence for our purposes here). With regard to every one of these
supposed prophecies and/or Bible verses claimed by Muslims to be prophecies of
Muhammad, as previously stated, either one or more of the following apply: 1) they have
already been fulfilled in a more precise manner by Christ; 2) they are so vague and
inspecific as to be applicable to just about anyone (contrary to what we have seen in the
above prophecies of Christ), or are simply references to people and places and cannot
really even be construed to be prophetic; or, 3) are completely misinterpreted. Muslim scholars point to Deut. 18:15 as probably their chief example of an Old
Testament prophecy of the coming Muhammad. Moses is speaking: "'The Lord your
God shall raise up for you a Prophet like me from among you, from your brothers, you
shall listen to Him.'" Although many prophets have come after Moses, all scholars
generally agree that in this prophecy Moses is foretelling of prophet who would be
distinguished from others. Muslims argue that while the word 'brothers' here could refer
to the Israelites' own people, it could also refer to the Arabs, descended from Ishmael,
Isaac's brother, and that in this case it does refer to Ishmael and the Arabs.
38 Also,
Muslims state that when Moses states this prophet would be "a Prophet like me," that
Muhammad was in fact like Moses, while Jesus was not, therefore this prophecy was
speaking of Muhammad, and not of Jesus, as Christians claim. They state, for example,
that both Moses and Muhammad brought a 'law,' Jesus did not; also, both Moses and
Muhammad fought physical battles against their enemies, and both had a family with
children; while Jesus did not experience either of these aspects; therefore, this coming
prophet could only be Muhammad, they reason.
39 Nevertheless, Muslims are greatly mistaken regarding all of these points and more. First
of all, because Moses in this passage is speaking to the nation of Israel, which is made up
of the twelve tribes, or sons of Israel, who were all brothers, the 'brothers' translation
37 38 In light of the uniqueness of Moses and Christ as prophets, the New Testament then
makes a comparison of the two, demonstrating the superior glory of Jesus over Moses:
"Therefore holy brethren, partakers of the heavenly calling, consider the Apostle and
High Priest of our confession, Christ Jesus, who was faithful to Him who appointed Him,
as Moses was faithful in all His house. For this One has been counted as worthy of more
glory than Moses inasmuch as he who built the house has more honor than the house.
For every house is built by someone, but He who built all things is God. And Moses
indeed was faithful in all His house, as a servant for a testimony of those things which
would be spoken of afterward, but Christ as a Son over His own house, whose house we
are, if we hold fast the confidence, and the rejoicing of the hope firm to the end," Heb.
3:1-6. While both Christ and Moses were distinguished from every other prophet by
means of their face to face relationship with God, Christ is clearly distinguished here
from Moses; Moses was the servant of God, Jesus is the Son of God; Moses was created
by God, Jesus is the Creator God. As stated, and further confirmed by the New
Testament, this prophecy was fulfilled by Christ, Muhammad is not an option. Muslims make another argument regarding Isaiah 42, specifically vs. 1-4, 10, 11; the
passage reads: "Behold My Servant whom I uphold; my chosen One in whom My soul
delights. I have put My Spirit upon Him; He will bring forth justice to the nations. He
will not cry out or raise His voice, nor make His voice heard in the street. A bruised
reed,
39 Taking these arguments one at a time, it is true that with the general language this
passage could fit, to a small degree, Muhammad's accomplishments. Many would argue
this passage could fit some of President Clinton’s accomplishments as well (stretching it
a bit!). The language is very general; there are few specific events or characteristics,
unlike what we have seen in various of the prophecies that Christ fulfilled. As stated,
Muslims claim that the 'law' mentioned in v.4 was brought by Muhammad (the Qu'ran),
but Christ brought no specific law, therefore, the passage could not be a prophecy of him
41
(as Christians claim). But Jesus did bring a law as we have seen, the law of Christ.
Regarding v.10, where the prophecy speaks of singing a 'new song;' there is nothing to
support the claim that this is referring to a new style of worship; the word in the text is
'song,' and 'song' actually fits best here. God is proclaiming a new work (v.9; "Now I
declare new things; before they spring forth I proclaim them to you." Therefore God is
encouraging his people to get excited about this new work, to have an excited attitude,
with praising and singing; "Sing a new song, sing His praise!" And Christians all over
the world do just this! Muslims state this is referring to the new style of worship that was
introduced with the coming of Islam; specifically the chanting of the call for prayer.
42 But
Muslim scholars acknowledge that the word 'sing' which is in fact used here in the text is
not the same word as 'chant,'
43 and that it is also against the Muslim faith to sing!
44
Think about it: Would God give a prophecy commanding people to celebrate and
sing about a new upcoming revelation He is to give forbidding singing!? Absurd!
Christians, on the other hand, are exhorted to worship God with "psalms and hymns, and
spiritual songs, making melody in your hearts to the Lord," Eph. 5:19. The Muslims
would be better off not to even bring up this passage, it applies specifically to Christ and
his church. The last issue is that Kedar, a descendant of Ishmael, is mentioned as one in
a list of seven peoples and locations in this prophecy who should praise the Lord. There
is nothing whatsoever in the text to link Kedar or any other
40 Up to this point there is really nothing substantial to link this passage to Muhammad
rather than to any number of great leaders, except possibly that he is known for bringing
a 'law,' the Qu'ran, but Jesus brought the law of Christ. Now let us put this passage into
proper perspective, and see who it is really about. The first line says it is about God's
Servant. This passage is one of a series of Servant Songs in Isaiah, the others being in Is.
49, Is. 50, Is. 52, Is. 53 (which we looked at in detail above in the prophecies which
Christ fulfilled: The Servant who was pierced through for our transgressions; his grave
was assigned with a rich man in his death; there was no deceit found on his mouth; etc.).
The number of prophecies fulfilled precisely by Christ in the Servant Songs firmly
establish Christ as Isaiah's Servant of the Lord. "The messianic interpretation of the
Servant Songs clearly follows the precedent set by Jesus and the apostles. The
identification of the Servant of Yahweh (the Lord) with Jesus the Messiah is evident in a
comparison of parallels between the accomplishments of Jesus and the Servant."
45 The
identity of the Servant of Isaiah's writings as the Messiah is firmly established in history,
being the most common view even of the Jews before Christ’s arrival.
46 Matthew, in the
book of Matthew in the New Testament applies this prophecy to Jesus (Matt. 12:17-21).
The new thing which God is going to do, and which he wants "the ends of the earth" to
praise and sing about (v.9,10), is the good news of Christ, the coming Messiah and
Servant. God wants everyone, far and near, to know about the Messiah, because he is to
be a blessing to all the families of the earth. Eight chapters later, in Is. 49:6, another
Servant Song, God says, "It is too small a thing that You should be My Servant to raise
up the tribes of Jacob, and to restore the preserved ones of Israel; I will also make You a
light to the nations, so that My salvation may reach to the end of the earth." In Acts
13:42 Paul correctly applies this passage to Christ. Christ also received the Holy Spirit
(Matt. 3:16; "And He saw the Spirit of God descending as a dove and coming upon
Him."), taught and brought justice, and did not raise his voice before his accusers (Matt.
26:62,63a). This is clearly a prophecy of Christ; Jesus has a clear historical precedent
as the Servant of the Lord in Isaiah; Jesus was in fact the ultimate servant, dying for
us, and Jesus fulfills it far more precisely than Muhammad (to whom it actually does not
apply, since singing is against the Muslim faith), the entire message being an exciting
announcement of Christ's coming, and one of a series of announcements by Isaiah of the
coming Messiah, which are the Servant Songs. A surprising argument that Muslims put forth as an indication of a prophetic connection
of Muhammad with the Bible is that the repeated mention of the name of Kedar in the
Bible, the people descended from the second son of Ishmael, coupled with the fact that
41 The final Old Testament passage we will deal with here which Muslims claim is a
prophecy of Muhammad is Is. 21:13-17. The passage is as follows: "The burden against
Arabia. In the forest in Arabia you will lodge, O you traveling companies of Dedanites.
O inhabitants of the land of Tema, bring water to him who is thirsty; with their bread
they met them who fled. For they fled from the swords, from the drawn sword, from the
bent bow, and from the distress of war. For thus the Lord has said to me: 'Within a year,
according to the year of a hired man, all the glory of Kedar will fail; and the remainder of
the number of archers, the mighty men of the people of Kedar, will be diminished; for the
Lord God of Israel has spoken it.'" Muslim scholars assert that this passage, referring to
Arabia and the Kedarites, (of whom Muhammad, founder of Islam, is descended) speaks
of a civil war between two groups of Kedarites, one oppressing the other, the oppressed
group being aided by a neighboring tribe of Temanites, and were not defeated. They then
state that this is what happened to the group of Kedarites led by Muhammad; they were
persecuted by fellow Kedarites, aided by Temanites, and were not overcome by their
oppressors. Therefore, they state, this is a prophecy in the Bible of Muhammad and his
call by God to prophethood and to announce a new revelation of God.
48 However, Muslim scholars have erred on several crucial points. First of all, curiously,
they do not bring up the Biblical reference, right there in the passage, to the name of the
oppressed tribe: "the Dedanites!" There is a reason they do not mention these people; the
Dedanites, the tribe actually oppressed according to the Bible, were a tribe of Arabians
who existed and were separate from the tribe of the Kedarites, and were not known as
Kedarites!
49 But Muhammad and his oppressed group were actually Kedarites, the tribe
42 Up to this point, we have not seen any prophetic Scripture that in any significant way
points to Muhammad or his claims to be a prophet as its object. The message about the
coming Prophet in Deuteronomy is directed to the Israelites themselves, with Christ
being the only prophet who was actually like Moses, with a personal relationship with
God. The Servant in Is. 42 can be none other than Christ. Frequency of names, and
even, as a rule, physical descendancy is of no avail regarding a covenant with God; God
calls, God establishes the covenant. And applying the Is. 21 prophecy to Islamic history
would be historically erroneous, and moreover, since it has a group of people as its
object, it cannot be applied to some imagined unstated individual. These are all Old
Testament prophecies, the chief ones Muslims put forth regarding Muhammad; turning to
the New Testament to examine Muslim claims there of prophecies of Muhammad, there
is really only one argument Muslims put forth for prophecy of Muhammad; but
numerous Scriptures are cited to support this one argument. The basic argument is that
the Advocate, or Helper (Greek: paracletus) foretold by Jesus, whom Jesus identified as
the Holy Spirit, was actually prophecy of Muhammad. Below are several of the cited
passages: 43 Jn. 14:16,17; "'And I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He
may be with you forever; that is, the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot see because it
does not behold Him or know Him, but you know Him because He abides with you and
will be in you.'" Jn. 14:26; "'But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, will
teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you.'" Jn. 15:26a; “`When the Counselor comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, the
Spirit of Truth who goes out from the Father, He will testify about Me…’” Jn. 16:7b; "'...for if I go away, the Helper will not come to you, but if I go, I will send
Him to you.'" Jn. 16:13; "'But when He, the Spirit of truth, comes, He will guide you into all truth, for
He will not speak on His own initiative but whatever He hears He will speak; He will
disclose to you what is to come.'" As stated, these references of Helper and Counselor continually described by Jesus
Muslims claim are prophecies by Christ of the coming of Muhammad.
52 They argue that
these references to the Helper, and others, use the masculine pronouns (he, him, etc.)
which do not fit the profile of a spirit,
53therefore must refer to a human being and not a
'spirit.' This person, therefore, is Muhammad. But the Scriptures consistently teach that
the Holy Spirit is a person, not a thing: He can be grieved; Eph. 4:2; "...do not grieve the
Holy Spirit of God...;" he can be lied to; Acts 5:3; "Ananias, why has Satan filled your
heart to lie to the Holy Spirit...?" and he can teach; I Cor. 2:13; "...taught by the Holy
Spirit." So the Holy Spirit is correctly referred to as a 'he;' the Bible is consistent in the
practice (you will not find the Holy Spirit referred to as an 'it' anywhere in the Bible),
and consistent in the teaching. In addition, in almost all of these passages, this Helper is
identified as the Holy Spirit. Is there a question about who the Helper is? Literary rule
#1 in finding answers: Read the text! For example, in Jn. 14:6, Jesus says, "The Helper,
the Holy Spirit, whom My Father will send,..." Here and elsewhere Jesus blatantly
identifies the Helper as the Holy Spirit! It is not some mystery prophet, such as
Muhammad, as Muslims claim, but the Holy Spirit. Some Muslim scholars will argue
that all the places where Jesus identifies the Helper as the Holy Spirit in the New
Testament texts are interpolations (i.e., inserted into the original text at a later date), but
the evidence demonstrates this to be an impossibility. As demonstrated previously, the
Bible, the New Testament included, is the most reliable book we have. Its internal
agreement, source reliability, and moral content are without peer, leaving the New
Testament undeniably trustworthy down to the word. The text says the Helper is the
Holy Spirit, and the text is correct. In addition to the text, the context refutes Muslim
claims as well. When Jesus foretells in various instances of the coming of the Holy
Spirit, Jesus says that he, Jesus, will be sending the Holy Spirit to his disciples, as
demonstrated in the quotes of Jn. 15:26a and Jn. 16:7b above. Almost without exception
in life the one who
44 45 We have taken a thorough look at Muhammad's and Islam's claims of biblical prophecies
and a biblical foundation for Islam, we have seen that according to the Bible, there is
clearly only one nation called as God's covenant nation, to be a blessing to the nations,
Israel, and this is an everlasting covenant which God is in fact still being faithful to
through the promised Israelite Messiah Jesus Christ, and that because of the very nature
of this being an everlasting agreement ("for the gifts and the calling are irrevocable,"
Rom. 11:29), neither Arabs, nor Muslims, nor anyone else can claim any special called
covenant status with God except in the sense of submitting to God's original new
covenant with Israel through Christ and becoming a "spiritual" Israelite (a Christian).
We have seen that there simply is nothing of substance to the Muslim claims of
prophecies in the Bible of Muhammad, in the New or Old Testaments, most of them
being far more precisely fulfilled by Christ or the Holy Spirit, the rest not considerable as
prophecy. Putting all this together, from a biblical standpoint, Muhammad's claims to be
a prophet from the Bible, and that the God of Islam is the God of the Bible, are an
impossibility. Muhammad's teachings, his "revelation" of the Qu'ran, blatantly contradict
the Bible, and could not be from the God of the Bible. However, Muslims can also take a
look at these Scriptures in the Bible, and they have, so how is it that they, even with all
this obvious evidence to the contrary, continue to maintain that Muhammad is a prophet,
having biblical roots? The answer is that the Muslims assert that the Bible has been
corrupted.
57In this way they are able to use any Bible verses which support their
teachings, calling them accurate, but reject as corrupted any verses which contradict the
Qu'ran and its teachings. This is why Muslims, while asserting a biblical foundation for
Islam, reject the Bible's clear teachings of Christ as the crucified and resurrected Son of
God, stating He was merely a human prophet. While this method is very convenient, it
also about as inconsistent as one can get, and terrible literary scholarship. And in answer
to this, as we have seen, the Bible is the most reliable book on earth. Its internal
agreement in teaching and data is excellent; it has proven itself to be, and is considered
by the experts to be, a flawless historical resource, and its moral teachings are without
peer. So which text is in error, the Bible, or the Qu'ran? A study of the Qu'ran reveals
that one of the first revelations Muhammad received (now in the Qu'ran) told him that if
he had any doubts about those revelations and the revelations about to be given him, that
he should consult Christians! The Qu'ran says, "'And if thou [Muhammad] art in doubt
concerning that which we reveal unto thee, then question those who read the Scripture
[that was] before
46 Muslims arrived at this dilemma, we are told, because Muhammad and the first Muslims
did not have direct access to the Bible in their language; they "could not read the Bible
(which was) available in the Hebrew and Syriac versions...whatever Muslims learned
about the Bible was based on hearsay from Jewish and Christian laymen."
62 Muhammad,
it appears, was not in a good position to double check his revelations with the
corresponding passages in the Bible, and therefore, he did not. As Muslims later began
to learn from the Bible directly or obtain a more precise knowledge of what the Bible
actually said (such as, for example, how God made only one everlasting covenant with
one nation, Israel, and specifically not with Ishmael), they had to account for these
discrepancies. Their solution was to begin teaching that the Bible had been corrupted.
But as we have seen, their own Qu'ran says this is not so (see Sura 6:115 above). The
Bible, it goes without saying, is without error or corruption, and it is the Qu'ran which is
in error. This paradox of Muhammad and his Qu'ran only serves to confirm what we have already
seen; Muhammad is a false prophet, and the Qu'ran is a false revelation; Muhammad and
his teachings are in direct conflict with the word of God, the Bible. Duet. 18:21,22, from
the real word of God, gives the criteria for false prophets, for which Muhammad has just
47 Christ's life, even the intricate details of his life, were accurately spoken of and written
down in the historical Bible of the Jews, the Tanach, which is the Old Testament of the
Bible, historically reliable as we have seen. They were precisely fulfilled in the New
Testament, also historically reliable. With just about each of the prophecies of Christ we
have seen, taken on their own we might not have anything of great significance; but taken
together, we are presented in a single body of ancient historical literature with detailed
picture of one who would come born of a Virgin, be called 'God with us,' proclaim a
message of freedom of the captives, suffer on our behalf as a servant, bring a new
covenant from God, be pierced through and die for our transgressions, and rise from the
dead. We then see in extremely reliable historical documents dated hundreds of years in
the future of the primary documents the history of one man who led this very life
described, tying the entire original picture together into an awesome plan of the salvation
of man by the eternal God. It is beyond the ability of man or men, here being the Old
Testament prophets, to have access to this type of and this detail of information about
what was for them the distant future. Where, then, did they get this information? Peter
says it came from the Holy Spirit; "for no prophesy was ever made by an act of human
will, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God," (I Pet. 1:21). The Bible states,
and the historical evidence backs it up, that the details of the Messiah, and likewise their
fulfillment, were from God, who alone knows the future. What are the chances of it being
coincidence that these detailed prophecies were all fulfilled by the one man Christ? A
study done by mathematician Peter Stoner, states that the chances of one person fulfilling
just eight prophecies in the detail in which Christ fulfilled his prophecies are 1 in 1017!
63
The remoteness of this probability, according to Stoner, is the same as if we were to take
an area the size of Texas and fill it two feet deep with silver dollars, then take one silver
dollar, paint it red, throw it in the midst of the rest of the silver dollars, stir them all up
(that's right, break out the tractors and the heavy equipment, we've got a lot of coins to
stir up), and then blindfold an individual, and then for him to pick out the red silver dollar
the first time. The chances are virtually nil. Josh McDowell, in his book Evidence That
Demands a Verdict, lists the eight specific prophecies Stoner used in this calculation, and
48 A final objection to the reliability of the above evidence of prophecies is that the
disciples who wrote the New Testament could have written the New Testament accounts
in a fraudulent manner, so that the events would have matched up with the Old Testament
prophecies which the disciples already had in the Scriptures. (As we have seen, no
alterations could have been made to the Old Testament prophecies, or in fact any of the
Old Testament at all, due to the two-way “ledger” system resulting from the miracle of
history of the Jewish faith and their preserved copies of Scripture identical to the
Christian Old Testament.) On the surface this sounds like a strong argument, but in truth
this question is just another form of the question, "Is the New Testament reliable? Can
we trust the accounts of its writers which state that Christ did in fact perform the given
prophetic events?" The untouchable reputation and track record of the Bible, as shown above in our look at
the validity of the Bible, answers that we most definitely can trust the New Testament
accounts to be accurate and truthful. Nevertheless, there is actually an additional and
amazing evidence available to us which will remove all possibility of doubt, giving final
and irrefutable confirmation that the New Testament documents are absolutely reliable.
We will see this evidence in the following section, "Christ Rose from the Dead," and it
will be a final confirmation of the New Testament reliability, because it will be a final
confirmation of the reliability of those who wrote it, completely refuting any further
arguments of the possibility of fraud on the part of those writers. Nevertheless, the
evidence we have already seen confirms we can trust in the eyewitness accounts of the
New Testament writers as accurate and true. Therefore Jesus did in fact fulfill
prophecies of the highest caliber of reliability, and being so numerous, detailed, and so
precisely fulfilled by him as to basically eliminate the option of coincidence or chance,
and crucially, this is bedrock evidence demonstrates a supernatural plan with Christ
at the center of that plan. There are no such prophecies of Buddha, and, as we have
seen the Muslim claims of biblical prophecies of Muhammad are false. One of the most crucial differences that sets Christ apart from Muhammad and Buddha is
that Christ rose from the dead. Muhammad lived, taught some things about life and
morality, died, and is still dead. Buddha lived, taught some things about life and
morality, died, and is still dead. Jesus lived, taught some things about life and
morality, died, and rose from the dead. Why is Jesus' resurrection important? First
of all, one of the main things that all religious teachers focus on in their teachings is
what happens in the afterlife (eternity). Jesus is the only one who demonstrated
authority and control in this area! He did this by rising from the dead, something
49 Second of all, not only does the resurrection put Christ in a place of demonstrated
authority in the area of life, death, and the hereafter, it virtually verifies all that he said;
he claimed to be Lord, the resurrection verifies this; he claimed that his death would pay
the price in full for our sins, satisfying God's wrath toward us; the resurrection verifies
this. And specifically, from a biblical perspective, "The resurrection expresses God's
satisfaction in what Christ has done. `The exaltation of the person is the vindication of
the mission.’"
65Jesus' resurrection assures us that his death for our sins was efficacious;
that is, that God does in fact consider it as acceptable payment for our sins, and shows us
that God is endorsing all of Jesus' claims including his claim of being Lord of all. The resurrection has profound implications; it is the historical evidence of victory over
death and the offer for us to share in this victory. For this reason, it is important for us to
examine this resurrection evidence carefully. The validity of the Bible has been shown;
it
50 The first evidence we have for Christ's resurrection is the Old Testament prophecies. The
Old Testament of the Christian Bible, which is equivalent to the Jewish Scriptures, the
Tanach, was in existence since before the arrival of Christ on earth. In the above section
"Fulfilled Prophecies by Christ in the Bible" are listed numerous Old Testament
prophecies that the Messiah would rise from the dead. Ps. 16:10, "For you, O Lord, will
not abandon My soul to Hades, nor will You allow your Holy One to undergo decay,"
was written 1000 years before Christ, and demonstrates the coming Holy One would be
raised back to life. Hos. 6:2 is an additional prophecy of the fact that the resurrection
would occur on the third day, and Is. 53, written 700 years before Christ and foretelling
his suffering, ends in v10-12, which foretells that after the Messiah has laid down his life
for others he would "see his offspring," he will be "allotted a portion with the great, and
He will divide the booty with the strong," demonstrating the resurrection. These
historical documents, which we has already seen to be reliable, stated hundreds of years
before the fact of the resurrection that it would occur, and are therefore a strong
confirming evidence of the resurrection. The second evidence we come across for Christ's resurrection is the eyewitness accounts
of the New Testament. The resurrection appearances of Christ in Matthew's gospel are
given below, and we saw a large portion of Luke's account of these appearances, as well
as portions of the other writers, in the an earlier section of this paper; but it is
recommended that the reader read the other three gospel accounts as well (Mark, Luke,
and John); while some of the story is reported by all, each writer supplies at least some
details unique to himself, and all tell an awesome story! The other gospel accounts can
be referenced in Mk. 16, Lk. 24, and Jn. 20, 21. Matt. 28: "Now after the Sabbath, as it
began to dawn toward the first day of the week, Mary Magdelene and the other Mary
came to look at the grave. And behold, a severe earthquake had occurred, for an angel of
the Lord descended from heaven and rolled away the stone and sat upon it. And his
appearance was like lightning, and his garment was white as snow; and the guards shook
for fear of him, and became like deadmen. And the angel answered and said to the
women, 'Do not be afraid; for I know that you are looking for Jesus who has been
crucified; He is not here, for He has risen, just as He said. Come, see the place where He
was lying. And go quickly and tell His disciples that He has risen from the dead; and
behold, He is going before you into Galilee, and there you will see Him; behold, I have
told you.' And they departed quickly from the tomb with fear and great joy and ran to
report it to his disciples. And behold, Jesus met them and greeted them. And they came
up and took hold of His feet and worshiped Him. Then Jesus said to them, 'Do not be
afraid, go and take word to My brethren to leave for Galilee, and there they shall see Me.'
Now while they were on their way, behold, some of the guard came into the city and
reported to the chief priests all that had happened. And when they had assembled with
the elders and counseled together, they gave a large sum of money to the soldiers, and
said, 'You are to say, "His disciples came and stole Him away while we were asleep."
And if this should come to the governor's ears, we will win him over, and keep you out of
51 As additional biblical evidence, The New Testament eyewitnesses and authors not only
report the event of the gospel, but they also repeatedly refer to the fact of it and place it
as a central part of Christianity. Luke, for example, restates the fact of Jesus' resurrection
and its significance as he quotes both Peter and Paul in their discourses in Acts. In Acts
2:23,24a,25a,27, Peter in his first sermon says, "This man was handed over to you by
God's set purpose and foreknowledge; and you, with the help of wicked men, put Him to
death by nailing Him to a cross, but God raised Him from the dead...David said about
Him,...'You will not abandon Me to the grave, nor will you let your Holy One see decay.'
Brothers, I can confidently tell you that the patriarch David died and was buried, and his
tomb is here to this day...Seeing what was ahead, he spoke of the resurrection of Christ,
that He was not abandoned to the grave, nor did His body see decay." Not only is Peter
referring to the fact of Christ's resurrection to prove Christ's authenticity, Peter gives an
example of where David of the Old Testament, who lived 1,000 years before Christ,
prophesies that Christ will rise from the dead. As stated, the Old Testament, backs up the
New Testament as additional biblical historical evidence, and not only that, but in the
miraculous form of a prophecy; and the disciples, as we can see, readily make use of this
evidence by quoting it! (See also Hos. 6:2b.) Additionally, and this is crucial, Paul
demonstrates the resurrection to be a central tenet of the Christian faith in I Cor. 15:3,4;
"For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received; that Christ died for
our sins according to the Scripture, that He was buried, and that He was raised on the
third day, according to the Scripture,..." This is Paul's summary of the gospel
52 In addition to examining the New Testament accounts of the resurrection and the New
Testament and the other Bible teachings of the resurrection, we can also look at the
people and events, surrounding and connected with the resurrection, inside and outside of
the Bible, to see if we can discover supporting evidence. Taking a look at history, we do
find this evidence. We find that eleven out of the twelve original apostles gave their lives
to the death for Christ and the claim that he rose from the dead. This evidence, upon
being shown to be reliable, is extremely compelling evidence. This represents eleven
examples of the strongest convictions for authenticity of an event that human beings are
capable of showing. And it represents yet another virtually undeniable evidence of the
historicity of the resurrection. The are strong words, but this evidence, along with the
Bible, has the strongest of implications regarding Christ and our relationship to him. To
determine the reliability of this additional evidence of the resurrection, we will need to
examine the surrounding details, as well as the hypothesized alternatives. The first step
involves taking a look at three things: 1) The historicity of Christ, 2) The disposition of
the apostles at the precise time of, and immediately following Christ's death, and 3)The
historicity of the accomplishments and martyrdoms of the apostles. Taking a look at the historicity of Christ, from the New Testament documents we know
that he was born in Bethlehem (Matt. 2:1a; "Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem...")
taught in Galilee and surrounding areas (Mk. 1:14; “And after John had been taken into
custody, Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of God.”). Reading the gospels
we can find a vast amount of what he did, what he said and what he taught (and doing
this is always a good idea for Christians and everyone). Finally we know that he was
crucified under Pontius Pilate (Mk. 15:15; "And wishing to satisfy the multitudes, Pilate
released Barrabbas for them, and after having Jesus scourged, he delivered him over to be
crucified"), and as we have seen from the above Scriptures, he rose from the dead.
Outside of the Bible, we find that there is indeed additional documented evidence of
Christ's existence in history. First, we have two accounts from Josephus, Jewish historian, in his Antiquities, A.D. 93;
"'About this time there arose Jesus, a wise man, if indeed it be right to call him a man.
He
53 Pliney the Younger, governor of Bythinia, corresponded by letter to the Roman Emperor
Trajan in A.D. 112, where he stated that "the Christians were accustomed to assemble
together regularly on a certain day, and 'to sing responsively a hymn to Christ as if to a
god.'"
68 Tacitus, a Roman historian of good repute, in his well-known Annals, A.D. 115,
describes how the Christians were persecuted in Rome. He then gives some background
on the origin of Christians: "'Their name,' Tacitus adds, 'comes from Christus [Christ],
who in the reign of Tiberius as emperor was condemned to death by the procurator
Pontius Pilate.'"
69 Another historical source is the Jewish Talmud, a collection of Jewish traditions; an
accumulation of teachings going back to the first century, written down in the fifth
century. The Talmud states that the founder of Christianity was born out of wedlock,
learned black magic in Egypt, where he was able to perform many marvelous works to
deceive the people, called himself God, was tried by the Sanhedrin, as a deceiver and a
teacher of apostacy, was executed on the eve of Passover by crucifixion or stoning, and
had various disciples.
70 While this data is obviously not in complete agreement with the
gospel accounts, "In general they confirm early Christian tradition by giving independent
- even hostile - testimony that Jesus of Nazareth really existed. It is noteworthy also that
the Talmud refers to Jesus' powers to perform miracles (although it attributes them to his
knowledge of black magic) and to his claim to be the divine Son of God."
71In the account
Jesus is referred to as Ben Pandera (Son of Pandera), acknowledging the Christian
teaching of Christ being born of a virgin (Pandera being a distortion of the Greek
'parthenos,' virgin).
72 Although the above list is not exhaustive, the references are more than enough to on their
own, apart from the Bible, establish Jesus as a historical figure who lived in Palestine in
the early years of the first century, led a group of people, and was condemned to death
under Pontius Pilate. The "independent accounts prove that in ancient times even the
opponents of Christianity never doubted the historicity of Jesus."
73It was not until shortly
before the twentieth century that the first attempt was made, and inadequate at that, to
deny the historicity of Christ. "Today no competent scholar denies the historicity of
Jesus."
74 Having established the historicity of Christ; the date of his existence, the fact of
54 Jesus had related God's plan several times to them; the victory at this time was not to be a
physical military victory for the nation of Israel (such as freedom from Roman
oppressors), but it would be a victory over spiritual forces, and for all men. He said,
"Even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life as a
ransom for many," Mk.10:45. He also foretold his death and resurrection several times;
for example in Lk. 9:43,44, Jesus, just finishing performing the awesome miracle of
healing a boy of an affliction (knowing that he has their complete attention), teaches
them as follows: "And they were all amazed at the greatness of God. But while everyone
was marveling at what He was doing, He said to His disciples, 'Let these words sink into
your ears, for the Son of Man is going to be betrayed into the hands of men,'" Lk. 9:44.
The following passage, Matt. 16:21,22, shows Jesus once again predicting his death, and
Peter's reaction demonstrates his disciples' lack of understanding of the coming event:
"From that time Jesus Christ began to show His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem
and suffer many things from the elders and the chief priests and scribes, and be killed,
and be raised up on the third day. Peter took him aside to rebuke Him, saying, 'God
forbid it, Lord! This shall never happen to You.'" The verses following in this passage
tell how Jesus then rebuked Peter, telling him to set his sights on God's plan, not man's.
Continually Jesus tried to change their view of the purpose of the Messiah, but their lack
of vision and a lifetime of tradition and teaching of a military Messiah leading an earthly
army was strongly engrained. As the events of the arrest, trial, crucifixion, and death of
Christ ensued, retreat and defeat is what we see. They abandoned him at his arrest; "they
55 So to the disciples, the death of Christ, at the time of its occurrence and immediately
following, was a devastating blow. The words of Christ's mockers while he was on the
cross must surely have been ringing in their minds as well; "He saved others, why could
He not save Himself?" Their own hopes and dreams of redeeming Israel at the side of
the promised Messiah were shattered. Jesus Christ, the awesome Prophet who had raised
dead people, healed the sick, cast out demons, who had taught with authority about God’s
love for man, about loving God and one's fellow man, who had answered every one of
the chief priests tests and traps; the supposed promised Messiah, had been arrested, tried
in a mock trial, beaten, whipped, crucified, and had died, right before their very eyes; and
it appeared Jesus had been powerless to stop it. And in fact it was almost certain at this
point that God, too, had abandoned him; he had allowed him to be convicted by the
Jewish synagogue, and had done nothing to intervene in Jesus’ execution. Their
Scripture even said, "Cursed is every man who hangs from a tree," Deut. 21:23. There
was no way a victory could come from this tragedy; or so they thought. Understanding
this mindset of devastating defeat as the significance of Jesus' death for the apostles at
the time of the event itself will help us to make upcoming points regarding the
resurrection. But what do the available reliable historical documents tell us actually became of these
cowardly, disillusioned, and defeated men? Let us now take a look at the subsequent
lives and earthly fates of these twelve disciples, beginning just fifty days after the
crucifixion: Peter, along with the other eleven disciples, fifty days after the Passover and Christ's
crucifixion, was boldly preaching Jesus in Jerusalem, (Acts 2:14,22b,23,24,36b); "But
Peter, taking his stand with the eleven, raised his voice and declared to them: 'Men of
Judea, and all you who live in Jerusalem, let this be known to you, and give heed to my
words...Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and
signs which God performed through Him in your midst, just as you yourselves know -
this man, delivered up by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God, you nailed
to a cross by the hands of godless men and put Him to death. And God raised Him up
again, putting an end to the agony of death, since it was impossible for Him to be held in
its power...know for certain that God has made Him both Lord and Christ - this Jesus
whom you crucified.'" The book of Acts tells us that Peter continued preaching in
Jerusalem and was arrested with threats several times (Acts 4:3; 5:18; 12:3). At one point
after being arrested and threatened by the chief priests, Peter and John replied to them,
"'Whether it is right in the sight of God to give heed to you rather than to God, you
56 Andrew, along with Peter and all the apostles, was arrested soon after the day of
Pentecost for preaching of Christ, but was freed as follows; "But the high priest rose up,
along with all his associates...and they laid hands on the apostles, and put them in a
public jail. But an angel of the Lord during the night opened the gates of the prison, and
taking them out he said, 'Go your way, stand and speak to the people in the temple the
whole message of this Life,'" Acts 5:17a,18-20. Andrew went on to evangelize and
found churches in Scythia (South Russia), according to Eusebius, then to Byzantium
where he founded a church, and finally to Acaia, Greece.
80 He was martyred by
crucifixion with chords instead of nails, sentenced by Aegeas, taking two days to die,
during which time he taught the people from the cross, according to ancient historian
Bernard, in his Sermon of St. Andrew.
81 Historian Newman, in 1685, reiterates this
account, adding that Andrew's cross was in the form of an "X," which is now known as
St. Andrew's cross.
82 A source known as the Acts of Andrew, written approximately AD
260, confirms Andrew's martyrdom in Greece.
83 James son of Zebedee, and brother of John, after boldly proclaiming Christ in Jerusalem,
was the first of the twelve to be put to death for his faith; "Now about that time Herod the
king laid hands on some who belonged to the church, in order to mistreat them. And he
had James the brother of John put to death with a sword," Acts 12:1,2. At the time of his
execution one of his accusers came to him and begged for his forgiveness, which James
gave him. The man then and there publicly professed his faith in Christ and was
executed on the spot with James, according to third century theologian Clement of
Alexandria.
84 Simon the Zealot, after beginning of the church, evangelized in Mauritania, and Africa,
then went to Britain, where he was crucified, according to fifth century historian
Dorotheus;
85 the trips to Mauritania and Africa being confirmed by Nicephorus, Patriarch
of Constantinople (758-829 A.D.).
86 57 Jude, also known as Thaddeus, thought to be the son of James who was son of Zebedee,
went on to preach Christ in Syria, Arabia, Mesopotamia, and Persia, suffering martyrdom
in Syria, according to Nicephorus Callistus.
87 Matthias, who was chosen by lot to replace the disciple Judas who betrayed Jesus ("Then
they prayed, 'Lord, You know everyone's heart. Show us which one of these two You
have chosen to take over this apostolic ministry, which Judas has left to go where he
belongs.' Then they cast lots, and the lot fell to Matthias; so he was added to the eleven
apostles," Acts 1:24-26.), preached the gospel in Armenia, and was eventually martyred
there for the Lord in Sebastople, according to Dorotheus.
88 Philip ministered to the Galatians, some of whom had previously emigrated to France,
known as the Gauls.
89 Philip followed their trail and evangelized as far as France, to the
Gauls and others, according to Isadore, Archbishop of Seville,
90 who states that afterward
Philip returned to Hieropolis, where he was stoned and crucified for the Lord. Third
century historian Jerome tells us that Polycrates, Bishop of Ephesus in the late second
century confirms Philip was martyred for the Lord in Hieropolis in Phrygia.
91 Nathaniel, also known as Bartholomew, is confirmed by many reliable sources, including
Eusebius,
92 to have evangelized in India, as far as Southern India, leaving a Hebrew copy
of the gospel of Matthew in India. According to Hippolitus, a second to third century
theologian and historian, Nathaniel was present at Philip's martyrdom in Hieropolis, also
being crucified; however, due to the occurrence of an earthquake and the resulting
conviction of Divine Judgment in the hearts of the people there on themselves, the
Hieropolis magistrates took down Nathaniel from the cross, Philip already being dead.
93
Nathaniel was eventually martyred for Christ in Albanople, Armenia, by order of the
governor in A.D. 68, according to Hippolitus.
94 Nicephorus tells us Nathaniel cheerfully
underwent his crucifixion, "comforting and confirming the convert Gentiles to the last
minute of his life.
95 Matthew, according to Eusebius quoting Papias, who was a disciple of John son of
Zebedee and who lived at the end of the first century, wrote the gospel that bears his
name, according to second century theologian Iranaeus.
96 Matthew had a strong ministry
to the Jews, his gospel emphasizing the "Jewishness" of Christ; his ancestry and the
fulfillment of prophecies, Matthew's gospel being the only one written in Hebrew.
Matthew is later said to have evangelized in Persia, according to St. Ambrose, an ancient
historian, and this would place the copy of the gospel of Matthew on the Indian trade
route for Nathaniel to obtain and take on to India.
97 Various sources including Catholic
tradition also place Matthew in both Egypt and Ethiopia,
98and Socrates, an ancient writer,
confirms Matthew's chief area of evangelism was Ethiopia.
99 Most authorities "affirm that
he was painfully put to death."
100 According to the Talmud, Matthew was condemned to
death (for his faith) by the Jewish Sanhedrin. This was most likely the Sanhedrin of
Alexandria, Egypt, because an important body of Jews was there.
101 Another ancient
confirming source, also places his martyrdom in North Africa.
102 58 Thomas went on to do a great work in India; "It is evident that St. Thomas arrived in
India no later than 49 A.D."
103 Witnessed by Dionysio, an author writing in 1578, there
was existing upon his arrival to Malabar, India a church and community with a testimony
of unanimous belief in the oral tradition that St. Thomas was the founder of their church
and that he underwent martyrdom for it, being run through with a lance by Brahmin
priests on a mountain slope while praying.
104 While the reliability of our earliest source
for Thomas' ministry in India, the Gospel of Thomas, written toward the end of the
second century, is considered questionable in some of its accounts, the report of Thomas'
apostulate to India is taken by modern scholars to be reliable.
105 Additionally, several
fifth and sixth century sources, such as the fifth century source, Martyrologium
Hieronimanum, place Thomas in India and affirm his death as taking place there.
106 The
sources and vast number of traditions even in existence today overwhelmingly confirm
these as the actual events of Thomas' life. John son of Zebedee was with Peter during several of his sermons in Acts (Acts 2:14 and
3:11), and was arrested with Peter at least twice, in Acts 4:3 and 5:18. Iranaeus, a
theologian who knew Polycarp who was a disciple of John, says in one of his writings
that John eventually went to Ephesus, and spent a considerable amount of time there
evangelizing and as a church elder.
107 According to Eusebius, it was while in Ephesus
that John was exiled to the isle of Patmos,
108 because of the testimony of Christ, as we see
at the beginning of Revelation, which John received on the island from Christ, and wrote
down: "I, John, your brother and fellow-partaker in the tribulation and kingdom and
perseverance which are in Jesus, was on the island called Patmos, because of the word of
God and the testimony of Jesus," Rev. 1:9. After his banishment he returned to Ephesus,
and wrote the gospel of John, according to Iranaeus.
109 Jerome, in his work The Nicene
and Post-Nicene Fathers, confirms John wrote the gospel of John and that he later wrote
I John at the request of the bishops of Asia to combat heresy.
110 Most sources agree as to
John's authorship of II and III John as well. John endured exile and other persecution for
Christ, being boiled in oil as a form of torture, but surviving.
111 John continued to teach
until he died of old age at age 99 in Ephesus. James the Less, also known as James son of Alphaeus, was put in jail for his faith along
with the other disciples, according to Acts 5:18. We have less historical accounts
regarding the life and ministry of James the Less than the other disciples; we know from
one reliable source that after his release with the other disciples from prison, he
continued to teach and proclaim the message of the Lord Jesus in Jerusalem and
surrounding regions, fearing no man, and was put to death for his faith by stoning at the
command of emperor Claudius.
112 The above is the history and earthly fate of the original twelve apostles. To further
strengthen the point to be made, included below is the history and earthly fate of three
additional disciples of Jesus; Paul, John Mark, and James the brother of Jesus.
Importantly, if anyone, of these three only Mark (John Mark) would have been a disciple
of Jesus at the time of Jesus' crucifixion, as we will see below. For Mark and James, as
for the twelve, the crucifixion of Christ would have been a first hand experience; this
59 Paul was the most zealous of all the disciples, completing four missionary journeys
throughout Asia Minor and Southern Europe, and going to Rome on the fourth, and
possibly reaching Spain (see Acts 13-14, 15:36-18:22, 18:23-21:14, 23:23 to the end of
Acts, and Rom.15:28 for accounts of these journeys). Paul, originally a Pharisee who
persecuted the Christians (He says in Galatians 1:22,23, "And I was still unknown by
sight to the churches of Judea which were in Christ; but only, they kept hearing, 'He who
once persecuted us is now preaching the faith he once tried to destroy.'"), made no
apologies for his dedication to Christ; his goal being to "know Christ, and Him
crucified," I Cor. 2:2. His devotion to Christ at all costs, even to the death (which he
knew ahead of time was his destiny), was demonstrated in another of his letters, where he
says in Phil. 1:21, "For to me, to live is Christ and to die is gain." Paul details some of
what he went through for the cause of Christ in II Cor. 11:23-25,28: "Are they servants of
Christ? (I speak as if insane) I more so; in far more labors, in far more imprisonments,
beaten times without number, often in danger of death. Five times I received from the
Jews thirty-nine lashes. Three times I was beaten with rods, once I was stoned, three
times I was shipwrecked, a night and a day I have spent in the deep...Apart from such
external things there is the daily pressure upon me of concern for all the churches." In
addition to the above letters in the Bible written by Paul (all of which have their
authorship identified as Paul at the beginning), he also wrote Romans, I and II
Thessalonians, I and II Timothy, Titus, and Ephesians. Paul finally did lay down his life
for Christ, Jerome tells us, in Rome in A.D. 64;
113on the same day and in the same
location as Peter. As a Roman citizen he could not be crucified, and so was beheaded.
His martyrdom in Rome is confirmed by many sources, including Eusebius.
114 Mark, though not being one of the twelve many think was a disciple of Jesus during His
time on earth, is best known for writing the gospel of Mark, the earliest of the gospels,
being written at the request of Peter while he was in Rome with Peter, says Clement.
115
Many think Mark is the young man his gospel alone records as escaping naked (!) when a
soldier grabs his cloak, at Christ's arrest (Mk. 14:51,52). He accompanied Paul on part of
his first missionary journey to Asia Minor (Acts 13:13), and was also with Peter in
Babylon to evangelize there (I Pet. 5:13). Mark later founded a church in Alexandria
according to Eusebius, and after Peter and Paul's martyrdoms in A.D. 64, he left Rome to
return to Alexandria.
116 While he was preaching there on Easter Sunday, some idol
worshipers, threatened by Christianity and in celebration of their own festival which
happened to fall on the same day, burst in and seized Mark, and then dragged him to
death.
117 James the brother of Jesus at first did not believe in Jesus (Jn. 7:5), probably out of
sibling jealousy. However, Jesus made a special resurrection appearance to James (I Cor.
15:7), and James was soon the elder of the church of Jerusalem! He shows himself to be
a decisive leader at the Jerusalem Council in Acts 15. He wrote the letter of James in the
Bible.
119 He was finally prominently confronted by the Pharisees before all the people to
60 As we have seen, the evidence inside and outside the Bible indicate that the disciples
without a doubt led bold lives totally committed to Christ and the furtherance of the
gospel. They endured extreme hardship and opposition, were jailed and exiled, and they
traveled great distances. Eleven out of the twelve laid down their lives for him, at
separate times and in separate places on the globe. And they died loving and praying for
their enemies, as Christ had taught and done. Mark, the writer of the book of Mark, and
James, the writer of the letter of James, also died for their testimony of the sinless life,
death, and resurrection of Christ, and Paul, who wrote most of the remainder of the New
Testament, including the letters to the Romans, the Ephesians, and the Colossians, though
he was not present for much of Christ's earthly ministry, eye-witnessed the resurrected
Lord and went on to lead a life of supreme commitment to the Savior, and to finally give
his life for Christ. And yet these are the same men who we earlier saw were dejected,
and disillusioned. What caused radical change, which we have seen is historically valid?
What caused them to make this total commitment to a Lord whom they had just
witnessed with their own eyes as rejected, seemingly forsaken of God, and executed?
Peter stated it in his first sermon: "God raised him up!" Jesus came back! Jesus rose
from the dead! "And while they were telling these things, He himself stood in their
midst. But they were frightened, and thought they were seeing a spirit. And He said to
them, 'Why are you troubled, and why do doubts arise in your hearts? See My hands and
My feet, that it is I Myself; touch Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones,
as you see I have'...And while they still could not believe it for joy and were marveling,
He said to them, 'Do you have anything here to eat?' And they gave Him a piece of
broiled fish, and He took it and ate it in their sight," Lk. 24:36-39,41-43. Jesus appeared
to them physically alive here and various other times demonstrating his victory over
death. Paul gives a partial list of Jesus' resurrected appearances in I Cor. 15:5-8: "And
He appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. After that He appeared to more than five
hundred brethren at one time;...then He appeared to James; then to all the apostles; and
last of all, as it were to one untimely born, He appeared to me also." These men
witnessed with their own eyes the resurrected Lord Jesus. God had not abandoned Jesus,
but instead had glorified him and given him the ultimate victory. Suggested Alternative Explanations to the Resurrection Are there alternatives besides the resurrection to explain what we have seen to be the
radically changed lives of the disciples, and their dedication to Christ to the death? There
61 Alternative #1 Could the apostles have invented the story to somehow bring some post-humus glory to their Master and to themselves? This alternative is actually suggested by
the Chief Priests as seen above in Matt. 27:63,ff. To answer, many men, as we have
seen in history, will give their lives for something they believe to be true, such as a
just war, or a heroic sacrifice for a friend, but no one will give their life for
something they know to be a lie. If these New Testament authors had fraudulently
altered the events of Christ's life, when the moment of truth came, where they were
offered the opportunity to recant and live or to stand on their testimony of the risen Lord,
they most certainly would have recanted. But history, both inside and outside of the
Bible, tells us that they each, as well as many others, made the ultimate sacrifice for
Christ. They all stood by their testimony, to the end - of this life! The resultant lives
of the disciples, being of the highest moral caliber, and their unswerving commitment
even to the point of death, does not allow for fraud to be a consideration. "But it is
acknowledged even by those who are not believers that so pure an ethical movement as
Christianity cannot have originated in deliberate fraud on the part of the disciples."
121
Looking at the facts, this hypothesis simply does not get off the ground. Alternative #2 Could Jesus have somehow survived the crucifixion, revived himself and
recuperated, and then returned and deceived the disciples into believing that he had risen
from the dead as he had foretold? Roman crucifixion was brutal and thorough. It was
the Roman centurions' job to be sure that the executed were dead, and they did. In the
case of crucifixion, since the victim normally dies of suffocation due to the position of
the lungs from hanging on the cross for a long enough period that the victim's legs are too
tired to support the body, the centurions break the legs to expedite death ("The soldiers
therefore came, and broke the legs of the first man, and of the other man who was
crucified with Him," Jn. 19:32.). If an individual already appears to be dead, another
procedure is to pierce the side and check to see what comes out of the wound. If the
blood has coagulated and separated from the body's water, then death has occurred. This
is what they found in Jesus' case, according to John the apostle's gospel, with John
testifying that he himself witnessed it: "...but coming to Jesus, when they saw that He
was already dead, they did not break His legs; but one of the soldiers pierced His side
with a spear, and immediately there came out blood and water. And he [John] who has
seen has borne witness, and his witness is true; and he knows that he is telling the truth,
so that you may also believe. For these things came to pass that the Scripture might be
fulfilled, 'Not a bone of Him shall be broken.' And again another Scripture says, 'They
shall look on Him whom they pierced,'" Jn. 19:33-37. With this stringent of procedures
in practice by the Roman centurions, and John's testimony that He saw Jesus confirmed
to be dead, the idea of Christ's surviving the crucifixion and returning to "rally the
troops" is simply inconceivable. As confirmation, the execution of Christ under pilate is
in fact taken to be a true event by competent scholars. Jesus did in fact die on the cross
in the A.D. 30's. 62 Alternative #3 Could the disciples have hallucinated that Jesus was risen? The
psychological frame of mind necessary for this hypothesis did not exist. As we have seen
above, rather than being confident and preoccupied with expectations of Jesus'
resurrection, the disciples were dejected and fearful. Even after all the predictions Jesus
made of his resurrection, and then some of the women coming and reporting to them
seeing a vision of angels telling of his resurrection, they still thought it was nonsense.
Thomas, being one of the last to see the risen Lord, gives the extreme example of this
skepticism which to some degree they had all had in his reaction to the resurrection
report: "The other disciples were saying therefore to him, 'We have seen the Lord!' But
he said to them, 'Unless I see in His hand the imprint of the nails, and put my finger into
the place of the nails, and put my hand into His side, I will not believe,'" Jn. 20:25.
When Jesus later appears in person and gives Thomas the opportunity to perform each of
his detailed confirmations, Thomas does not take him up on it, but "Thomas answered
and said to Him, 'My Lord and My God!'" Jn. 20:28. The hopeful attitude conducive for
hallucinations was not there. Additionally, "the possibility of the occurrence of
hallucination is lessened in inverse proportion to the number of persons to whom Jesus is
represented as having appeared."
122 The idea that these eleven defeated, scared, and often
stubborn men who had seen Christ's death first-hand to all have the same hallucination
with the degree of confidence of its genuineness so that they would be willing to go and
lead totally selfless lives for Christ and ultimately die for him, is utterly absurd. The resurrection is the only acceptable explanation for the disciples' radical commitment
to Christ and their willingness to lay down their lives for him. Additionally, the
subsequent historical events of the writers of the New Testament, allows no possibility of
fraud or falsifications in their writings and teachings. As stated, even those who are not
believers recognize that so pure an ethical movement as Christianity cannot have
originated in deliberate fraud on the part of believers. And this is the final irrefutable evidence of the New Testament reliability referred to in
“Christ Fulfilled Prophecies:” The changed lives and martyrdoms of the disciples who
were the writers of the New Testament is the final confirmation of the New
Testament writers, demonstrating they are absolutely reliable, and therefore
confirming the New Testament itself is reliable, and thus the validation of the
historical fact of the fulfillment of the Old Testament prophecies of the Messiah by
Christ as reported in the New Testament, a supernatural accomplishment made
only by Christ! What is more, to expand on a previous point and at the same time get a closer look at the
disciples’ new post-resurrection mind-set, there was far more here than a demonstration
of power over death. Jesus had told them many times ahead of time that the whole event
of the crucifixion was going to happen, and that he would rise from the dead. The angel
at Jesus' empty tomb had said, "He is not here, for He has risen, just as He said," Matt.
28:6a. The disciples were seeing that once again, what Jesus had said would happen, did
happen. This was an object lesson for the disciples which they should have learned by
63 64 "Let goods and kindreth go Martin Luther, from the hymn "A Mighty Fortress Is Our God" Where does this leave us? Jesus Christ did in fact rise from the dead. This is what the
Old Testament predicted, this is what the New Testament confirms, this is what the
disciples stated, and this is what the historicity of Christ, the confirmed disposition of the
disciples, and the historically documented changed lives and absolute devotion of the
disciples substantiate; being the only realistic explanation for the transformed lives, far-reaching ministries, and ultimate martyrdom of almost all of the disciples, resulting in the
rapid spread and growth of the Christian church across the face of the earth. As we stated
previously, the implications of this are profound: This verifies Jesus’ claims to be Lord
and to be the only way to God. And Jesus' demonstration of control over the entire
crucifixion and resurrection event, deliberately choosing to give his life for us to save us
from sin and rising from the dead, clearly shows that he loves us, and he is from God;
and as we have previously pointed out, if he is from God, then everything he has said is
true: He is the only Son of God, and he is the resurrection and the life. There is no one
better to place our trust in than the One who has proven himself trustworthy. Jesus has
demonstrated that he is the Son of God, and that he loves us; and he offers us salvation.
Please receive Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior now, if you have not already, giving
him control of your life. At the end of this paper is a suggested prayer and guidance in
this decision. Christ's Life and Teachings Unparalleled in Human History Jesus Christ has already been shown to stand on a completely different plain than
Muhammad, Buddha, or anyone else because of the outstanding evidences of fulfilled
prophecy and the resurrection. But there is yet another, equally weighty criteria that
again sets Christ apart in a big way, his life and teachings. While it can be said that both
Muhammad and Buddha had teachings some of which, as we have seen, were of moral
value, and most would agree they each left (by many standards) an example of good
ethical character for us, we will see that Christ does far more than this, since it is his goal
to bring us into the most important relationship of our life. Salvation by Faith, Not Good Works What Christ taught about how man is to relate to God, and God's plan of salvation for
man is so child-like in principle as to appear obvious once fully grasped, and yet is so
profound that no other teacher of any other religion has even coming close to matching it:
A relationship with God and salvation by grace (unmerited favor) through faith, not by
works (i.e., leading a good life). "For by grace you have been saved through faith; not of
yourselves, it is the gift of God; not as a result of works, that no one should boast," Eph.
2:8,9. Jesus, when asked by some Jews what good works they must do to be saved, put it
65 Why, we may ask, is the teaching of salvation Jesus' way, as a free gift through faith,
superior to the teachings of the way of salvation according to Muhammad or Buddha,
both based on individual human achievement or good works? To answer this, we will
give an imperfect, but sufficient, illustration: A child in a healthy, well-relating family
knows that he is loved and accepted for himself, and he knows that when he has done
wrong that love and acceptance is still there (although some correction may follow). He
does not have to earn or achieve his relationship in the family; by faith (trust and belief)
he knows he has value as a human being and is part of that family. His membership in
his family is a free gift he obtained at birth. He knows there are certain things he should
and should not do (behave, not misbehave), and certain responsibilities he has (school,
chores, using his talents, etc.), but these are because he is a member of the family, not so
that he can become or remain a member. As much more mature as this child is who sees
his family relationships as by faith compared with the child who feels he must earn his
place in the family, or earn the approval of his family, so much more morally mature is
the teaching of salvation by faith over any teaching of salvation by good works, the latter
of which every other religion besides Christianity espouses. As the child of faith above,
a Christian does not do good deeds in order to attain to salvation, a Christian does them
because he or she has been saved. They are the result of the changed life of a believer,
done in thankfulness, love, and obedience. In fact, the Bible actually uses "family"
terminology to explain becoming a part of God's people, the family of God. Just as the
child above received his place in his family as a free gift simply by being born into it, so
also Jesus said we "must be born again," Jn. 3:3. John says, "But as many as received
Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, even to those who believe in
His name, who were born not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man,
but of God," Jn. 1:12,13. Paul says, "For you are all sons of God through faith in Jesus
Christ. For all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ.
There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male
nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you belong to Christ, then you are
Abraham's offspring, heirs according to the promise," Gal. 3:26-29. The New Testament
also speaks of God as Father. Importantly, when studying the texts, we find that Jesus
never refers to the Fatherhood of God in connection with all humanity. He only spoke of
66 Objections raised to this method of salvation as a free gift by faith frequently cite the
hypothetical criminal who has done terrible things all his life and is condemned to die,
then repents at the last minute. "If God lets this individual in, and not someone else who
led a good life but did not believe in Jesus, how is that just?" the argument goes. First of
all, the Bible says, "God is not mocked, for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap,"
Gal.6:7. God knows our hearts ("He who searches the hearts knows what the mind of the
Spirit is..." Rom. 8:27a). Only an individual who is genuinely sorry for his sins and has
repented of them and believed will be saved. Only God knows that individual's heart;
only he can know whether an individual such as the above hypothetical condemned
criminal, if he were given more time to live, would live a changed life in keeping with his
outward confession. Second of all, the Bible says we have all sinned and fall short of
God's requirements (Rom. 3:23). Since "God dwells in unapproachable light," (I Tim.
6:16), and no sin may enter his presence ("Your eyes are too pure to look on evil," Hab.
1:13), if we have committed even one sin, we have become transgressors; "For he who
keeps the whole law, and yet stumbles in one point, he has become guilty of all," Jas.
2:10. So if we are going to try to make it by our own power, God requires perfection.
The individual who wants to get to heaven by his own merit and not by trusting in Christ,
would have to keep from sinning from the beginning to the end of his or her life. But
even this is not possible, however, because the Bible says we are born in sin. Looking at
the fall of the human race with Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden (Gen. 3), we can
see man's first time of choosing to do things his way instead of God's way, which
introduced sin into the world: "And he said, 'Who told you that you were naked? Have
you eaten from the tree that I commanded you not to eat from?' The man said, 'The
woman You put here with me - she gave me some fruit from the tree and I ate it.' Then
the Lord God said to the woman, 'What is this you have done?' The woman said, 'The
serpent deceived me and I ate.'...To Adam he said, 'Because you have listened to your
wife and ate from the tree about which I commanded you, "You must not eat of it,"
cursed is the ground because of you...'" Gen. 3:11-13,17a. The curse represents that sin
has entered the world, because of Adam and Eve's first sin. Because Adam and Eve were
sinful, all their descendants are sinful at birth, including us; "Surely I was sinful at birth,
sinful from the time my mother conceived me," Ps. 51:5. So we are born into sin, and we
need a Savior to rescue us from it, since we cannot do it ourselves. God sent us this
Savior, Jesus. Jesus led the perfect life which we are unable to lead (I Pet. 2:22), then
died on the cross to pay for our shortcomings (sins), and then rose from the dead.
According to the Bible, the way it actually works is that Jesus takes away all our
unrighteousness (sin), and gives us his righteousness (his perfect life); "He made Him
who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, that we might become the righteousness of God
in Him," II Cor. 5:21. Paul talks about it
67 From a different angle, the Bible indicates, and many would agree, that if we look at God
as the Creator and source of all things, then all good ultimately comes from him and him
alone. All of our gifts, talents, abilities, everything, is from him. If we are seeing our
salvation as based even partly on good works in any way originating from us, we are
negating this principle, because we are failing to see that even our ability to do those
works, and even our ability to choose to do those works, which we are attempting to take
credit for, is ultimately a gift from him, and therefore something for which he should get
the credit, not us! This is why Paul says in Eph. 2:9, "we are saved by grace...that no one
should boast." If we were to somehow achieve eternal life through our own power, we
would be boasting, and wanting some of the glory. But "our own power" is actually
God's power on loan, so he deserves and should get all the glory. The truth is, Jesus said,
"Apart from Me you can do nothing," Jn. 15:5. Once we realize this, our good works
take on a new meaning. Similar to the child who obeys and completes responsibilities
because he is loved and a member of the family, so our good deeds will be not to achieve
salvation, but because we already are saved, loved, and a part of the family of God, with
God as our Father and Jesus as our brother. We will be doing good works because we
are thankful that we have been saved from our sinful past, and out of love for the Father
and
68 The above concept of Jesus' righteousness being credited to the account of those who
believe as a free gift sounds almost too good to be true, but it is true! The word "gospel"
means "good news," and Jesus Christ is the Good News! The Bible says that if we have
received Christ, salvation is a promise from God! "We know we have passed from death
to life, because we love the brothers..." I Jn. 3:14. Jesus says, regarding believers in him,
"My Father, who has given them to Me is greater than all, and no one is able to snatch
them out of the Father's hand," Jn. 10:29. Christians have crossed over from death to life,
and are children in the family of God, safe in the palm of their Father's hand. This is
strong language! God uses language like this to assure believers in him of their eternal
security, because of the Good News: The price has been paid, in full!!! When God's
children know for certain that their eternity is secure, this emboldens them to live
excited, courageous lives for God, bringing Him more glory! Not only in Christ's superior teaching of salvation by faith does Christ show himself
superior, and distance himself from Muhammad and Buddha, but in many individual
teachings as well. For example, what is commonly called today the Golden Rule, is from
Christ. It states, "Therefore whatever you want others to do for you, do so for them..."
(Matt. 7:12a). Most regard this to be the highest of all moral teachings on man's
relationship to his fellow man, as we pointed out in the section on the validity of the
Bible. The commandment closest to Jesus' Golden Rule in the Old Testament is from
Lev. 19:18, "Love your neighbor as yourself," which most understood to mean love for
one's fellow Israelite. The Golden Rule, however, implies love and concern for all men,
exercised without reserve. Jesus Christ gave us this teaching; Muhammad didn’t, and
Buddha didn’t. If we want to know who has the truth, look to the one even most non-Christians acknowledge has the truest statements. Christ is without peer!!! Christ's Perfect Example, Enabling a Relationship with God Ultimately, the greatest teaching of Christ came from the way he lead his life. What he
taught, he lived, perfectly, in fact, according to the Bible, which says he was without sin
(Col. 5:21.). He said, "Follow me," and gave the perfect example. "There are few men
who can follow an abstract ideal; all men are capable of devotion to a person. It was the
supreme accomplishment of Jesus as a teacher that he exemplified in himself all that he
taught."
126 As we have seen in the section “Christ Fulfilled Prophecies,” the Biblical
evidence contains both Old Testament prophecies and New Testament eyewitness
accounts of Christ’s sinless life (see, for example, Is. 59:7-9, and I Pet. 2:21-23). Jesus
provided the perfect example by committing no sin. This is a perfect example of
obedience. But with Jesus, this was only the beginning. He also taught about and gave the perfect
example of love; loving others, and loving God. He taught about loving others, saying,
"...love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you..." Matt. 5:44, and
69 Being the perfect example not only involves perfectly loving others, it involves telling
the whole truth; therefore much of Christ’s teaching involved who he is: The Son of God.
Demonstrating who Christ is, God’s own Son, assures that God gets the glory and credit
for Jesus’ perfect example. There is a down side to this: Christ’s claims to be the Son of
God, while being the truth, continually caused controversy for him, and as we will see,
are one of the factors that resulted in his crucifixion. Taking a look at these claims, Jn.
5:18 says Jesus was "making Himself equal with God," Jn. 5:18. In John 8 the Pharisees
accuse Jesus regarding an implication he made to have seen the patriarch Abraham (of
the Old Testament, who lived almost 2000 years before Christ’s earthly mission); "The
Jews therefore said to Him, 'You are not yet fifty years old, and have You seen
Abraham?' Jesus said to them, 'Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was born, I
Am,'" Jn. 8:57,58. Jesus did not say “I existed,” or “I was,” as might seem more
appropriate for the context, but "I Am." "I Am" was God's covenant name given to
Moses on Mt. Horeb; "Then Moses said to God, 'Behold, I am going to the sons of Israel,
and I shall say to them, "The God of your fathers has sent me to you." Now they may say
to me, "What is
70 So is Jesus the Son of God, equal with God, as he claimed, and as the Old Testament
indicated the Messiah would be? Two accomplishments would say definitely yes. His
first accomplishment is that after making these claims of divinity, as we have seen in the
section on the resurrection, Jesus was then put to death in the presence of many
witnesses,
71 Leading a morally perfect life, according to the Bible, would demonstrate Christ to be the
Son of God, since mankind is sinful at birth, and has fallen short of the glory of God;
therefore this is something which only the divine Son of God, born of the Virgin Mary
and conceived of by the Holy Spirit, could achieve. Even from an extra-biblical
perspective; there has been no one in history apart from Christ whose life has
demonstrated the moral character and reputation to be able to make the claim to be
completely without sin and to be able to historically develop a widespread allegiance of
others to this claim, as Christ did in Christianity.
127 But amazingly, this allegiance to, or
belief in, Christ's claim to be without sin is not limited to the Bible and Christians! The
well-known, and in many ways admirable, Hindu teacher and social leader Mahatma
Ghandi said of Christ's spotless life, "The gentle figure of Christ, so patient, so loving, so
full of forgiveness that he taught his followers not to retaliate when abused or struck but
to turn the other cheek - it was a beautiful example, I thought, of the perfect man."
128 To
add to this, as previously pointed out, Muhammad and the entire Islam faith, as stated in
72 Our conclusion to the question, "Is Christ the Son of God?": An undeniable "Yes!!!" We
are able to arrive at this conclusion because of the overwhelming evidence of Jesus'
resurrection, demonstrating his foreknowledge and control of events and people, as well
as his power over death; plus his morally perfect life, a claim stated in the Bible and
adhered to by billions of Christians and non-Christians; making a virtually untouchable
case for all the claims which Jesus made, including that of being the only Son of God.
Therefore the truth about the false accusation of blasphemy that the Pharisees and scribes
had initially arrived at is the very reason they were not able to find anything else of
which to accuse Christ; because Jesus is Lord of all, he was able to lead the perfect moral
life, and therefore to leave absolutely no room for accusations; the only accusation the
scribes and Pharisees could come up with ignored this obvious evidence in front of them
(Christ's sinless life; the inability of anyone to rightly accuse Jesus of doing anything
whatsoever wrong) and was a decision based on a false assumption with no evidence at
all, decided on in jealousy, and as we have seen, their false assumption has been
invalidated by Christ’s reputation and resurrection. Jesus is Lord! In demonstrating Christ is the Son of God, we have refuted the allegations of blasphemy
against him, the only claim anyone has made against Christ’s character. Christ did in fact
lead a sinless life; the evidence of the Old Testament prophecies, the New Testament
eyewitness accounts, the evidence of Christ’s flawless reputation still intact hundreds of
years after his earthly mission, is conclusive evidence even other religious founders and
teachers can’t deny. What makes Christ’s sinless life so important? Completing a
previously made crucial point; there are two main areas that cover virtually all of
what every religious teacher teaches about: Morality in this life, and what happens
in the next life. Jesus is the only One who demonstrated authority in morality in
this life by living an absolutely perfect life. And as we have seen, Jesus is the only
One who demonstrated authority in the afterlife by rising from the dead. Anyone
can teach or claim anything. That doesn’t make it true. Jesus is the only One who
irrefutably proved the truthfulness of his claims in these areas and his authority to
make these claims, by rising from the dead and committing no sin. Someone once
said, “One’s faith is only as valid as the object in which it is placed;” Jesus is the
only One who proved himself worthy of our faith regarding things moral and
eternal by proving
73 We have been investigating and confirming Christ’s character, his perfect life. However,
we have in the process discovered something even more important than what he has
accomplished; and that is, who Christ is: The Son of God, equal with God himself! Why
is it so important that we realize that Jesus is the Lord, the Son of God? The answer lies
in the deeper meaning to Christ’s coming to earth and becoming a man. His initial
objective is to save us from our sins, but He has a deeper objective: So that we might
know him. He became one of us and came to live among us so we can see his life and
get to know him personally. God greatly desires a relationship with each one of us; a
relationship that starts here on earth, and continues into eternity! We can see the event in
John 1:1-14, where Jesus is referred to as the “Word:” "In the beginning was the Word,
and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God.
And all things came into being by Him. And apart from Him nothing came into being
that has come into being. In Him was life, and that life was the light of men. And the
light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it. There came a man
sent from God, whose name was John. He came for a witness, that he might bear witness
of the light, that all might believe through him. He was not the light, but came that he
might bear witness of the light. There was the true light, which, coming into the world,
enlightens every man. He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and
the world did not know him. He came to his own, and those who were His own did not
receive Him. But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become
children of God, even to those who believe in His name, who were not born of blood, nor
of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. And the Word became flesh,
and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory of the only begotten of the
Father, full of grace and truth." Jesus Christ is the Word made flesh, who came to us and
lived among us, dying for us and then rising from the dead, enabling us to know God: Do
you want to know God? Get to know Jesus, and you’re getting to know God! God
greatly desires this relationship with us; this is his ultimate desire for us. The intensity of
God's love for us and his desire for this relationship with us is demonstrated in his
willingness to become a man in the person of Christ and to give his life for us. And it is
through this demonstration of love that God is able to reach through to the thick and hard
hearts of we human beings, softening our stubborn self-will, and enabling us to enter a
relationship with him. It is when we human beings realize who it was that gave his life
for us on the cross, spiritual regulation- and rule-following can be done away with and an
obedience and a trust out of love coming from the heart can begin. Through Christ, the
Word of God made flesh, and his great act of love at the cross, God breaks through the
barriers and speaks to the human heart, establishing this personal relationship which is by
faith. God is the God of relationships; he invented relationships. Most people readily
agree that relationships, people, are more important than possessions, pleasure, or
achievements. The Bible states that this is because God made us this way; the second
half of the greatest commandment in the Old Testament is "You Shall love your neighbor
as yourself." These relationships are horizontal relationships - with other people; God
wants more for us than just these horizontal relationships with others, he wants a vertical
74 Our goal in this part of this paper was to see how Christ is different from Muhammad and
Buddha. What we have seen is not only substantial, but profound. As shown in this last
section, while Muhammad teaches of a distant God who merely gives commands to be
followed and rules to be obeyed, such as repeating a prescribed prayer five times a day
and fasting at prescribed times, Jesus teaches of a God who is close by, who makes "his
dwelling among us," and who makes possible obedience from the heart, coming from
knowing him as a friend and Father; while Muhammad reveals the ultimate goal of life to
75 Jesus Christ Vs. Religious Cult Leaders We have examined the teachers of other religions, using Muhammad and Buddha as
examples, to see how Christ is different. But some claim a difficult seeming
inconsistency arises with regards to those who come in Jesus' name, identifying
themselves as Christians, or even identifying themselves as Christ Himself returning as
Biblically foretold, and typically incorporating moral and religious teachings into their
message, but whose actions and morality turns out to be an atrocity, and the ultimate
outcome of themselves and their followers often is a tragedy. An example of this would
be the Heaven's Gate cult, whose leader convinced thirty-nine of its members to commit
suicide in 1997.
130 While the deception and corruption of the cults and their leaders are
usually quite obvious once the occurrence of an event such as the above mentioned
tragedy has taken place, the fact that they use the name of Christ and his teachings, or
other moral teachings as part of their deception, brings up some tough questions: How
could this happen? These cult members had the Bible; where was God, could He not
have helped them? And additionally, how can we know if an individual is teaching the
truth? And in this manner, how can we know that Christ taught the truth? As we begin to deal with this issue, it should be noted that this problem of corrupt and
deceptive teachers aligning themselves with a particular religion resulting in disaster is
by
76 Since we are primarily dealing with individuals who are misusing the Bible and its
teachings, individuals basing their identity, authority, and claims in part or in whole on
those teachings, our first step is to establish the authority of the Bible. This will enable
us to put false teachers, and their false claims, into proper perspective, bringing the false
into
77 The Old Testament clearly places God's word, the Scriptures, as our highest authority.
Is. 8:20 says, "To the law & to the testimony, if they do not speak according to this word,
it is because they have no light in them." The 'law' in both the Old & New Testaments is
the Law of Moses (the first five books of the Bible: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus,
Numbers, & Deuteronomy), the 'testimony' is the testimony of the prophets (the
remainder of the Old Testament); since this Scripture is from the Old Testament, it is
referring to the sum total of God's word as revealed up to that point, demonstrating it to
be authoritative; this also being the regular practice of the faithful high priests &
prophets. Even more absolute though, Psalm 138:2 says, "I will worship toward Your
holy temple, and praise Your name for Your lovingkindness and Your truth, for You
have magnified Your word above all Your name." This is a profound statement; God has
lifted his word above his name! A name represents the character, reputation, attributes,
the very identity of an individual, including his position of power & authority; God's
word, his revelation to us, is of higher authority than his name! How can God's word be
of higher authority than seemingly God himself? As discussed previously, God's word is
equated with God himself: Jesus, the eternal Word of God, is God (John 1:1,14)! God,
who "calls those things that do not exist as though they did" (Rom. 4:17b), foresaw that
Christ, the eternal Word of God, would come & live the perfect life, fulfilling perfectly
all of God's commands; therefore instead of merely symbolically representing God's
character, nature, & authority, as God's name does, Jesus, the Word of God, is God, being
"the brightness of His glory & the express image of His person," (Heb. 1:3). The
undeniable conclusion according to the Bible is that to give any command or teaching
from any source other than the Bible a higher place of authority than God's word is to
elevate such a command or teaching above God himself, which is idolatry! In the New Testament, Christ is our perfect example, what place did he give to the
Scriptures (i.e., the Bible)? Jesus taught that the Scriptures are our ultimate authority.
When debates arose regarding religious matters, Jesus always referred to the Scriptures
as the ultimate authority to resolve the issue. For example, when being questioned
regarding the way to eternal life, he refers to Scripture (Luke 10:26): "What is written in
the Law, how does it read to you?" He clearly places Scripture over any teachings of
elders and religious authorities in Mk. 7:9b, and in many other places, where He rebukes
the scribes & Pharisees for placing their traditions above God's word: "Jesus rebuked
them, saying, 'You nicely set aside the commandment of God in order to keep your
tradition....Making the word of God to no effect through your tradition which you have
handed down...’" Mk. 7:9b,13a. He also quotes the prophet Isaiah from the Old
Testament (Is. 29:13) to rebuke them: "'In vain does this people worship me, teaching as
doctrines the commandments of men,'" Mk. 7:7. See also Mk 12:24, Matt. 12:3-5, Matt.
4:4. And in correcting the Jewish teachers regarding his identity as prophesied in the
Old Testament, Jesus says "the
78 Importantly, while as pointed out above that the validity and the authority of the Bible
are not the same, they are interconnected. Since we have established that the evidence
indicates the Bible to be a valid and trustworthy document, that is, that it is true and
accurate, therefore its authority in truth extends not only over Christians, but over all
humanity. The Bible says there is one God, and that he has fixed a day when he will
judge all humanity according to what they have done with his Son, Jesus, the Word of
God. Jesus made it clear, God’s Word is the standard of judgment for all men.
Occasionally individuals, when confronted with this message, reply, "Oh, I don't believe
in God," as though that settles the issue; since they don’t believe in God, then nothing the
Bible says applies to them. But our decision to not believe in a truth does not affect in
any way its truthfulness. God will still judge humanity on the last day, including those
who chose not to believe in him. Therefore those who did not choose to place the Bible
in authority over their lives in this life will find that it is authoritative over their lives at
79 Since therefore, the Bible is the Christian's highest authority, all professing Christian
leaders and teachers and their teachings need to be held up to the Bible and its truths:
"The word of God is living and active, sharper than a double-edged sword, it pierces to
dividing joints and marrow, soul and spirit; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the
heart," Heb. 4:12. Jn. 1:1,14 tells us that Christ is the Word of God; he is the only one
who lived out and followed God's commands precisely. Therefore we compare
everything to him; he is our ultimate authority. Teachers and leaders identifying
themselves with Christ and Christianity who conflict with Christ and the Bible in what
they teach or do, and continue in this manner even when confronted with their error, are
to be rejected as false teachers. The Bible vs. Do and The Heaven's Gate Cult Do founded the Heaven's Gate cult in 1993 in Southern California. Do claimed himself
to be Jesus Christ (i.e., a re-manifestation of the actual person of Jesus Christ).
131 He
taught that modern religions had been taken over by rebel souls (the Devil and his
legions), and were using Christianity to enslave the would-be "children of the light."
Only by grafting themselves onto Do could they escape. The flesh was seen as merely a
vessel. Do claimed that since Christianity was corrupted by these rebel souls, he was
now the only true way; "Leave all behind," he said; "Come, follow me," echoing the
words of Christ.
132 Amazingly, he openly associated himself with other self-appointed
and deluded and false "messiahs" and cult groups such as David Koresh and the Branch
Davidians, the Unabomber, the Freemen, and the Solar Temple - a cult group that has
conducted three mass suicides since 1994, a total of seventy suicides.
133 Searching for
signs of "higher life," he soon heard over the internet that a UFO four times the size of
the earth would be coming in the wake of the Hale-Bopp comet which was regularly
appearing in the night sky during the Spring of 1997.
134 Do decided that this was the sign
he had been waiting for; that this ship was coming to collect them and take them to a
“higher place.” He instructed his followers that the way to join with the ship was to leave
all behind and commit suicide. Tragically, this lead to the mass suicide of almost the
entire group. So once again, we want to find out how where God was in all this; how
could something like this happen, and how can we know if we are following a
trustworthy leader? In answering these questions, we will show that God was in fact
faithful to these cult members, we will show how the members themselves repeatedly fell
short of making wise decisions, and we will show that Do was clearly a false teacher; we
will do all of this by observing and applying the tools and the methods God has given us
to recognize these teachers. In examining Do and the Heaven's Gate cult, as in just about any other cult, we find the
membership to be made up of individuals purportedly seeking truth, the meaning of life,
and a way out from a corrupt world and from their own problems. First of all, and
speaking objectively to begin with, when seeking truth, especially as new seekers, most
80 81 Our first point above regarding investigating the Heaven's Gate cult began objectively,
because we were speaking, to begin with, of people who were not necessarily Christians
to begin with, but were seekers in general; as we began to discuss their membership with
the Heaven's Gate cult, we were able to begin speaking subjectively regarding Scripture,
since the Bible was to some extent regarded as their guide. From this point on we will be
speaking subjectively regarding Scripture; this is a group claiming in one form or another
to be Christians, therefore the Bible applies. Second of all, then, to reiterate what Christ
said above, "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly
are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits." Jesus states that their fruits
(deeds, their values, the type of life they lead), will reveal the truth about them. This
allows us to compare the character of the teacher with what the Bible teaches that makes
a follower of Christ. John says in I Jn. 2:7b,8, "By this we know that we are in him: The
one who says he abides in him ought himself to walk in the same manner as he walked."
Our life should reflect that of Christ's; one of love and purity. Did the Heaven's Gate
leader Do fit this criteria? Do openly associated himself and his cause with suicide, and
with other cults which practiced suicide. In fact, while on the internet (for the business
which the cult operated), his followers were instructed to actually market suicide as a
positive alternative to the people of internet suicide prevention groups!
135 This belief of
Do’s was no sudden surprise to any of his cult members. Suicide is the murder of one's
self. The Bible teaches that all life is valuable; "For You created my innermost being;
You knit me together in my mother's womb. I praise You, because I am fearfully and
wonderfully made; Your works are wonderful, I know that full well," Ps. 139:13,14; and
that murder is wrong: "...and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him,"
I Jn. 3:15b (although a penitent murderer will be forgiven by God, I Jn. 1:9). Do's fruit
was bad, through and through. His continual teaching and his final act and the final act
of his members, as taught by him, was murder! He fails John's test of being in Christ (a
Christian) - he was clearly not walking as Christ walked - he was not a Christian at all
according to the Bible's standards, let alone a Christian leader. Once again, the members
of the cult had this standard, the Bible, available to them; and surely they had at least
heard the Ten Commandments in their lifetime, including, "You shall not murder," (Ex.
20:13), this Biblical command being well-known to pagans as well as Christians in this
society, and also most other world societies today. They failed to take any wise action,
but continued following a leader whose teaching was in direct conflict with what at least
most of them would have known to be the teaching of the Bible, which they were
professing as their guide. At the point they became aware of Do's pro-suicide beliefs,
this is where, for most of them, they made a voluntary choice to be deceived. The Bible
speaks of this very occurrence: "For a time will come when they will not endure sound
doctrine; but wanting to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves
teachers in accordance to their own desires; and will turn away from the truth, and will
turn aside to myths," II Tim 4:3,4. Regarding Do's specific teachings about having this "knowledge" about the Christian
church in general being corrupted by evil rebel souls from the devil, and of following
himself, Do, as being the only way to reach the next life, amazingly, we can see in the
Bible teachings against a first century cult with almost identical teachings!
136 I & II John
82 Do, in claiming to be Christ, advocating murder, and teaching a completely errant
doctrine was self-conflicting and corrupt from the beginning. Despite general wisdom
which says to be careful and do some investigation on whom or what you devote your
life to when seeking the right path, and despite these above teachings and clear warnings,
and many others, from Jesus and John and many others in the Bible about false teachers
and true vs. false doctrine, and some clear methods of distinguishing and discerning
them, these members either disregarded these teachings, or did not bother to make the
small amount of effort required to seek them out. The Bible itself was either not
consulted for wisdom to take the right path, or else if it was, no one had the courage to
assert themselves and take a stand against a clearly false teacher. And as previously
stated, most would have been aware of the commandment against murder in the Bible
even without seeking it out. Therefore wisdom to attain to the right path was not only not
83 Contrast their outcome with the promise to those who truly set their hearts on genuine
wisdom: "How blessed is the man who finds wisdom, and the man who gains
understanding. For its profit is better than the profit of silver, and its gain than fine
gold. She is more precious than jewels, and nothing you desire compares with her.
Long life is in her right hand; in her left hand are riches and honor. Her ways are
pleasant ways, and all her paths are peace. She is a tree of life to those who take
hold of her, and happy are all who hold her fast." Prov. 3:13-18 By comparing the teachings of our leaders with God's word, as Jesus did and as the Bible
instructs us to do, and by comparing their lives and their "fruits" with the standards for a
Christian leader which we find in God's word, and by desiring the truth with all our
hearts and having the courage to stand up for the truth, we can avoid being deceived by
false teachers, and have the long life and happiness the above proverb describes. Christ's Leadership vs. the Leadership of Do and Typical Cult
Leaders Taking a look at the typical profile of a cult leader, typically the cult leader will claim a
special status or qualification that makes a distinction between himself and others,
including other religious authorities; putting that leader and his teachings as “not to be
questioned.” How can they do this? Very simply; usually the leader will have a
somewhat charismatic personality, but the important thing is that since it is the leader's
group, he makes the rules. This is part of the criteria of joining, and membership is
usually at will, so members by joining agree to this stipulation. Do claimed to be the
Christ who had returned with new information (that is, that religions, and Christianity in
particular, had become corrupted by the devil, and that only through him could
individuals escape this corruption). Cult leaders also typically isolate their membership
from society, breaking their ties of family and friends. This greatly strengthens their
leader's influence, control, and authority. Do demanded that all Heaven's Gate members
sever relationships of family, friends, and community, and as we have seen he did not
submit himself to Scripture, and his teachings either twisted the Scriptures or were in
complete contradiction to it. He also did not obey the governmental "law of the land;" he
was openly promoting suicide and ultimately committed it himself, and caused it to be
committed by others. Cult leaders, rather than being law-abiding good citizens and good
examples, often defy and break the law. Jesus, while asking for personal allegiance from his followers, as we have seen, still
submitted himself to the Scriptures. God's word was his ultimate authority. He did
redefine certain ceremonial and dietary laws, such as in Mk. 7:18,19, pertaining to foods,
84 And rather than setting himself up as the unquestioned and unquestionable leader, as cult
leaders as a rule do, Jesus always encouraged honest and sincere questions and seeking.
At the beginning of Mark 4 Jesus teaches a parable (a story to demonstrate a spiritual or
moral principle) to the people, and then ends with "'He who has ears to hear, let him
hear,'" Mk. 4:9b. Some of the people then come up to Jesus to ask for understanding:
"And as soon as He was alone, His followers (lit., those about Him), along with the
twelve, began asking Him about the parables. And He said to them, 'To you has been
given the mystery of the kingdom of God; but those who are outside get everything in
parables, in order that while seeing, they may not perceive; and while hearing, they may
not understand...'" Mk. 4:10-12a. Here Jesus not only encourages questions, but teaches
the people that the key to spiritual growth is to come forward and ask when something is
not understood. Those who ask learn the truth, but those who do not bother coming
forward to ask, remain imperceptive and without understanding, by their own choice of
inaction. And with regard to challenges to his teachings, "traps," or debative questions
from his enemies, Jesus never avoided these, but remained in the "public arena" to
demonstrate that he had nothing to hide and was not afraid of the opposition. In fact, in
just about every synagogue, as well as other places, the Pharisees, Sadducees, and scribes
questioned and confronted him. For example, from the first three chapters alone of the
book of Mark, representing the first year of Christ's three years of ministry, we find the
following far from all-inclusive list of confrontations of Christ by his contemporary
religious counterparts: Mk. 2:6b,7a, "...scribes sitting there and reasoning in their hearts,
85 Jesus' practice was clearly to remain integrated and involved in society. Where were the
disciples and Jesus every Sabbath and many times during the week? In the synagogue!
Luke 4:16 says, "...and as was His custom, He entered into the synagogue." Jesus'
integration and involvement with the communities around him is further demonstrated by
his statement at his arrest (Matt. 26:55): "At that time Jesus said to the multitudes, 'Have
you come out with swords to arrest Me as though I were a robber? Every day I used to
sit in the temple teaching and you did not seize Me.'" While Jesus, having nothing to
hide, operated in public in daylight, it was his enemies who came out at night to arrest
him. And while there are exceptions, it was not a pre-requisite that Jesus' followers cut
ties to families or friends. While Peter, James, John, and the others had to leave their
families temporarily in order to travel around with Christ; "Then Peter answered and said
to Him, 'Behold, we have left everything and followed You; what then will their be for
us?'" Matt. 19:27; "Jesus answered, 'And everyone who has left houses or brothers or
sisters or father or mother or children or farms for My sake, shall receive many times as
much, and shall inherit eternal life,'" Matt. 19:29; this was for the logistical purposes of
travel and effective ministry, not for isolation; in Mk. 1:30a,31, for example, Jesus and
the disciples are at Peter's home, and Jesus heals Peter's mother-in-law; "Now Simon's
mother-in-law was sick with fever...And He came to her and raised her up, taking her by
the hand, and the fever left her, and she waited on them." and we also learn from Paul
that all the disciples had been reunited with their wives once Jesus' earthly ministry was
complete: "Do we not have a right to take along a believing wife, even as the rest of the
apostles, and the brothers of the Lord, and Cephas [Peter]?" I Cor. 9:5. So in following
Christ, then and now, the occasional call to leave family is usually due to logistical
constraints, and not for isolation or deliberate separation, although there are exceptions to
this. The fact is, Jesus was so integrated and involved in society that it sometimes got on
his disciples' nerves; but when it did, it always turned out that it was their own short-sightedness that was to blame. For example, at one point when the disciples are sick of
all the crowds being around them and they ask Jesus to send the crowds away, partly for
lack of food, Jesus first feeds them, 5000 men, plus women and children, and does so
miraculously from a total of five loaves of bread and two fish; "and they all ate, and were
satisfied," Mk. 6:42,44. The disciples learned a lesson of servanthood, and to depend
directly on God to meet the need. Jesus also was a good example in society, obeying the
governmental "laws of the land," rather than disregarding them and committing crimes,
as cult leaders often do. As previously mentioned, the Bible exhorts to obey all
governing authorities. Jesus never committed, nor advocated committing, a crime; he
even paid his
86 In summary, Christ's leadership example was to fully submit himself to Scripture, to
permit and even encourage honest questions, to be continually available to challenges
and confrontations, to be high profile and involved in society and in the church, to be a
law-abiding citizen, and instead of having anything to hide, to be a good example to all,
relating the exciting message of God's love and salvation openly to as many as possible.
Do and typical cult leaders are quite different, picking and choosing the Scriptures they
wish to submit to (if any), while ignoring, twisting and concealing the rest, and, as stated,
they are separate from society and are the unquestioned leaders, avoiding confrontation
because they know their deeds are evil. Jesus said, "For everyone practicing evil hates
the light and does not come to the light, lest his deeds be exposed. But he who does the
truth comes to the light, that his deeds may be clearly seen, that they have been done in
God," Jn 3:20,21. God was faithful to those cult members in leaving them the example
of Jesus, the perfect leader. We can use Christ's example of leadership as well, as a
means of testing our leaders and determining if they are genuine, and thereby avoiding
the deception of cult leaders. Are they themselves fully submitting to all of God's word,
and honestly, without twisting it? Are they integrated and involved in society, unafraid
of questions, law-abiding, and openly living a good example, excited about God's love
and desiring to share it with others? The answer should be yes to all of these if they are
claiming to be followers of, and especially leaders for, Christ. We are going to finish this second part of this paper, "Jesus Christ vs. Religious Cult
Leaders" by focusing on the specific situation of people who have joined a cult who have
little or no benefit of a Christian background or exposure to the Bible; the question is:
These people appear to have at least made an effort to move away from ignorance and
rebellion against God, and toward Christ and the Bible, by joining a leader of a group
87 First, God has given all men a conscience. As stated, cult leaders typically isolate the
cult, placing themselves as the unquestioned ultimate authority. Because the members
have placed themselves in this position of submission to one individual as the ultimate
authority, they are greatly disadvantaged in doing what is right. While they have a
conscience, the very fact that they have made commitment of submission to their cult
leader quite often has compromised the operation and effectiveness of their conscience,
in part because they would have already ignored the witness of their conscience’ warning
against unwisely submitting to an individual with unconfirmed integrity, and in such an
absolute manner. That we have a conscience is evidenced both inside and outside the
Bible. Paul says in Rom. 2:14,15, referring to non-Christians and non-Jews (Gentiles),
and taking the "law" to mean the Old Testament moral law given to the Jews, "For when
the Gentiles who do not have the law do instinctively the things of the law, these, not
having the law, are a law to themselves, in that they show the work of the law written in
their hearts, their consciences bearing witness, and their thoughts alternately accusing
them or else defending them..." As far as Christians are concerned, Peter says, in I Pet.
3:16, "...Keep a good conscience..." The conscience, therefore, is a tool God has given us
to keep us on the right path. Outside the Bible there is further clear evidence of the
existence of the conscience distinct from animal instinct. "Historically, almost every
culture has recognized the existence of such a faculty. Ancient Egyptians, for example,
were urged not to transgress against the dictates of the heart, for one 'must stand in fear
of departing from its guidance.'"
137 But while the concept of the moral conscience is so
established in history and cultures, the recent "new age" movement has made arguments
against the concept of existence of the human conscience, and its distinctness from mere
animal instinct. The typical argument against the existence of the conscience and its distinctness from
instinct says that there is really no distinctive difference between the two; the conscience
is really no more than a highly developed set of instincts. Webster's dictionary defines
instinct as "a complex response to environmental stimuli without involving reason," and
adds that it is "inheritable and unalterable."
138 The goal of instincts is to both preserve the
individual and the group or species.
139 The "new ager" argument says that the conscience,
being a merely a more developed set of instincts, is therefore merely a more sophisticated
tool for the preservation of the individual and species. But Webster's defines conscience
as a knowledge by one's inner self of the moral right and wrong of one's own
88 Having demonstrated that the conscience is, without a doubt, of Divine origin, regarding
the operation of the conscience, regarding cult members, once the initial typically unwise
decision has been made to join the cult, the compromised position the typical cult
members have placed themselves in when submitting to a leader who demands
unquestioned authority, as the cult leader brings in false teaching which the members’
consciences would most likely be telling them is wrong or dangerous, the members
typically choose to ignore this witness of their conscience, and defer to the leader’s
judgment, due to his position. Regardless of cultural background or past exposure to the
Bible or to Christianity, any honest seeker would realize that he would be able to read the
material (the Bible) himself, to verify the integrity of the leader, as to whether that leader
is accurately representing, teaching, and himself following, true Biblical Christianity; and
especially when one is committing one's life to the cause (the cult), this seeker's reason
and conscience would be there to convict him that this would be the only wise thing to
do, and to fail to take this step would be very unwise. However, out of the desire to
remain with the cult, demonstrating motives of possibly of a need for acceptance,
belonging, or purpose, or a combination of these, and also demonstrating the lack of
genuine motives of an honest search for the true God, the leader's demands for absolute
89 Second, arising from our God-given conscience and reason, we have governmental laws,
which is the criminal and civil justice system, which each society establishes, creating
along with this the "laws of the land;" our societal standard of right and wrong from a
standpoint of keeping the peace and allowing the society to function safely and be
productive. These laws serve as reminders to do what is right, deterrents against doing
wrong (forms of punishment back up these laws), and as correction when the law is
broken (punishments). A typical cult leader will often place himself above the law of the
land, rather than submitting to it, and as the absolute leader, will usually insist the cult
members do the same when so directed. As pointed out, the Bible teaches we are to
submit to governing authorities, and it is only in rare instances that the Bible will
advocate breaking a governmental law, and this is only when it is in clear violation of a
crucial principle of the Bible, such as preservation of human life, or the spread of the
gospel. The law is there to remind everyone what is right in society. Nevertheless, this doesn't in any way negate the urgency that believers have of
proclaiming the gospel message of salvation through Christ: While some will believe
without hearing about Christ's death on the cross, the Bible makes it clear, many more
will believe when they are told of Jesus. Jesus is the climax of God's gospel story to us,
the "Greatest Story Ever Told!" "For the law was given though Moses, but grace and
truth came by Jesus Christ," Jn. 1:17. Grace abounds, enabling more people to believe
91 Fourth, in addition to the individual conscience, and the governmental "law of the land"
originating from the conscience, also in part originating from the conscience God has
given the collective sense of morality, or moral code, to humanity to keep us on the right
path. To take a more detailed look at this, in every society, Christian or non-Christian,
today and in the past, we find a general standard of “right” and “wrong” that is at times
separate from, and goes beyond, our legal "right" and "wrong." While this standard has
not always been the same in every society, “these differences never amounted to anything
like a total difference. If anyone will take the trouble to compare the moral teachings of,
say, the ancient Egyptians, Babylonians, Hindus,…and Romans, what would really strike
him will be how very like they are to each other and to our own…”
141 Societies have
almost without exception agreed on basic moralities such as the evils of selfishness,
murder, theft, adultery, suicide, dishonesty, etc. “Men have differed as regards to what
people you ought to be unselfish to, whether it was only your own family, or your fellow
countrymen, or everyone. But they have always agreed that you ought not to put yourself
first. Men have differed as to whether to have one wife or four. But they have always
agreed that you must not simply have any woman you liked.”
142 Rom 2:14,15 above talks
about this basic societal morality or standard that even societies who have not had
contact with the Bible show that they still have; a sense of the basic teachings of the
Bible and its moral teachings operates in their hearts; their establishment of their own
moral “law” shows this to be true. "...even a cursory study of anthropology show us that
every culture has had some type of belief system. Human kind is incurably religious."
143
This morality contained in every society, coming in the form of religious teachings and
writings such as Christianity and the Bible, Islam and the Qu’ran, Hinduism and the
Upanishads, Buddhism and the Tipitakas, etc., as well as in the form of historical and
cultural traditions and teachings, acts as a guide to doing what is right, and is given
ultimately from God. While according to the Bible the various religions themselves are
not from God - only Christianity is - these religions demonstrate the existence of this
moral code, which comes in part from the conscience, as Rom. 2:14,15 indicates, and
also from the wisdom found in God’s creation around us. While these different religions
are evidence of the existence of God (who will save people from these other religions, if
they seek him) and are evidence of God's gifts of morality and wisdom to all men, they
are also evidence of man's sin and stubborn self-will. Is. 53:6a says, "All we like sheep
have gone astray; we have turned, everyone, to his own way." God gives mankind
morality, wisdom, and additionally he sends his Holy Spirit to draw all men to himself as
the true God through Christ: "'And when He has come, He will convict the world of sin
and of righteousness, and of judgment,'" Jn 16:8. But people often refuse God's true
revelation of himself, and instead create their own "god." "God created us in his image,
and we
92 While we have been focusing on the extreme types of cult leaders and cults who are
typically anti-social, committing illegal and dangerous acts, as well as being unscriptural
in their teachings and practices, such as Do and the Heaven’s Gate cult, there are cults
that are far more subtle in there deviations from the truth, yet as the Bible says, they are
“having a form of godliness, but denying its power. And from such people turn away!” II
Tim. 3:5. These cults can appear much like a Christian church, and they and their leaders
can even be integrated in society (unlike the typical extreme cult leaders), and yet still be
false teachers. These cults can be recognized and avoided using some of the same
methods as for the extreme cults; when joining any group or institution claiming to be
Christian, its leaders’ character and teachings should be tested and compared with Christ
and the Bible, as demonstrated in this section. In regard to these subtle cults, the best
strategy is to specifically focus on their teachings about God, Christ, and salvation in the
Bible, determining whether or not they line up with God’s word, as well as the leaders’
integrity in following what they teach. A common characteristic virtually all cults share,
both extreme and subtle, is that they deny the Deity (Godhead) of Christ. As we have
seen, the Bible clearly teaches that Jesus Christ is the Lord of All; he is the Creator God
(as the Bible says, “For in Him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily,” Col. 2:9).
Since the Christian’s goal is to know Christ, a basic and necessary step to knowing Christ
is first of all knowing who He is. These cult groups have ‘a form of godliness,’
appearing like a regular church, but in denying Christ’s Deity, they are ‘denying its
power,’ because they are denying the power of the life-changing message of the true
gospel, that the Lord of All himself gave his life for us, the ultimate demonstration of
love enabling a personal relationship with the Lord; therefore they prevent the possibility
of a true relationship with Christ for the cult’s members. Therefore if the group or
institution and its leaders do not teach that Jesus is equal with God, or if they contradict
the Bible in other areas, they are a cult of false teachers, and as the Bible says, “from
such
93 God has given tools to all mankind, demonstrating his faithfulness to everyone in giving
guidance to everyone to choose wise paths, and to stay away from foolish and destructive
teachings, such as those of cult leaders. As we have seen, people who end up in these
disaster-prone cults are largely responsible for, if not completely responsible for, their
own predicaments and resulting tragedies. They did not just suddenly find themselves in
their dangerous environments, as much as some would like to make it sound was the
case; they were not just "ordinary folk" who were all of a sudden "innocently duped," nor
were they honest seekers, searching with all their hearts for the true God; if their were, as
we have seen, God is faithful, and would have rescued them. Instead they were almost
always individuals who deliberately made one unwise decision after another, turning
away from the true faithful God's provision of the individual conscience, societal
encouragement, societal standards, and cultural moral codes, compromising these for a
new thrill or adventure, or an easy form of acceptance. Most importantly, God has given us Jesus, who gave his life on the cross and rose again.
Jesus said, "'When you lift up the Son of Man, then you will know that I am He, and that
I do nothing of Myself; but as my Father taught Me, I speak these things,'" Jn 8:28b.
When we focus on Jesus, his perfect example of obedience to God and his demonstration
of total love for us, and we compare the teachings and lives of our leaders and ourselves
to Christ and his word, and then do our best to seek and follow Jesus courageously and
with all our heart, and to choose Christ-like leaders, we will have no need to fear, for
God's guidance is sure: "The secret of the Lord is with those who fear Him, and He will
show them his covenant. My eyes are continually toward the Lord, for He will pluck my
feet out of the net," Ps 25:14,15. In answer to our question in the introduction to this paper, "How can we know who is
right and what is the truth?" We can know because God demonstrated it in Jesus with
irrefutable proofs. The truth is, no one can compare with Jesus. Jesus is the only one
who fulfilled prophecies, having his coming, identity, and accomplishments a fore-ordained plan of God verified by documented history; he is the only one who rose from
the dead, demonstrating his absolute authority over man's most feared and certain earthly
outcome, and affirming his claim to be the source of all life; he is the only one who led a
perfect life, demonstrating the authority of his moral teachings, never doing anything
wrong and always showing perfect love and compassion to those in need, being the
perfect example as a human being and a leader, to show us how to stay on the right path
and free from deception, but more than that, as the perfect example of love Jesus
served
94 To receive Christ and become a Christian, pray to God: "Lord Jesus, please forgive me for my sins, and forgive me for doing
things my own way all of my life. Thank you for dying on the cross
paying the price for my sins, and rising from the dead. Please come into
my life, and take control of the 'throne' of my life, and make me the
kind of person you want me to be. Thank you for saving me. Amen." If you prayed this prayer, and it represents the desire and decision of your heart, Christ
has come into your life, as he promised, and you have been saved for eternity. He is your
Master and your best friend, and he will never leave you (Josh. 1:5). Do your best from
now on to follow him with your life. Find a Christian, and tell them of your decision,
then find a church which preaches God's word, and attend it regularly. Below is a 'GROWTH' tool to help you grow in your relationship with Christ: 95 Go to God in prayer daily Read God's word daily Obey God moment by moment Witness for Christ in word and deed Trust in God for every detail of your life Holy Spirit: Allow him to empower and guide you 96 References 1 Smith, Huston, The Religions of Man. San Francisco: Perennial Library, 1965, p93,101-104,127. 2 Asfour, Mohammad, Arabic in Three Months. Woodbridge: Hugo\'s Language Books Ltd., 1990, p183. 3 Abdul-Haqq, Abdiyah, Sharing Your Faith With a Muslim. Bethany Fellowship, 1980, p16, 95. 4 Ibid., p72,187. 5 Parshall, Phil, New Paths in Muslim Evangelism. Grand Rapids, Baker Book House, 1980, p137. 6 Abdul-Haqq, Abdiyah, ibid., p75. 7 Parshall, Phil, ibid., p138. 8 Ibid., p58,59. 9 Abdul-Haqq, Abdiyah, ibid., p162. 10 Parshall, Phil, ibid., p78. 11 Burtt, E. A., The Compassionate Buddha. New York: New American Library, 1955, p20. 12 Hamilton, Clarence H., Buddhism. Indianapolis: Liberal Arts Press, 1952, p xvi. 13 Ibid., p79. 14Bach, Marcus, Major Religions of the World. Marina del Rey: DeVorss Publications, 1984, p52. 15 Ibid., p55. 16 Ibid., p56. 17 Lester, Robert C., Buddhism: The Path to Nirvana. San Francisco: Harper & Row Publishers, 1987, p7 18 Ibid., p82. 19 Smith, Huston, p27. 20 Ibid., p34-61. 21 Ibid., p107. 22 Knechtle, Cliffe, Give Me an Answer. Downers Grove: Intervarsity Press, 1986, p107. 23 McDowell, Josh, Evidence That Demands a Verdict. San Bernardino: Here\'s Life Publishers, 1979, p55. 24 Ibid., p39. 25 Ibid., p40. 26 Ibid. 27 Ibid., p41. 28 Ibid., p40, quoting John Montgomery, History and Christianity 29 Gaines, James R., "The Week," Time (16 Aug. 1993). New York: Time, Inc., 1993, p19. 30 Henschel, Milton G., The Watchtower (Vol117, No. 20, 15 Oct. 1996). Brooklyn: The Watchtower Bible
and Tract Society, 1996, p31. 31 McDowell, Josh, ibid., p65. 32 Safra, Jacob E., The New Encyclopaedia Britannica/Micropaedia, Vol 6. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 1997, p485. 33 Safra, Jacob E., The New Encyclopaedia Britannica/Macropaedia, Vol. 22. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc., 1997, p337. 34 Metzger, Bruce, The New Testament. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1986, p161. 35 Ibid. 36 Allen, Clifton J., The Broadman Bible Commentary; Jeremiah-Daniel, Vol. 6. Nashville: Broadman Press, 1971, p440-441. 37 McElveen, Floyd C., The Mormon Illusion. Ventura: Regal Books, 1983, p132. 38 Badawi, Jamal, Islamic Teachings: Muhammad: Last Messenger of Allah (Audio Cassette L4). Halifax: Islamic Information Foundation, 1987, Side 2. 39 Ibid. 40 Abdul-Haqq, Abdiyah, ibid., p112. 41 Badawi, Jamal, Islamic Teachings: Muhammad: Last Messenger of Allah (Audio Cassette L5,6). Halifax: Islamic Information Foundation, 1987, Side 2. 42 Ibid. 43 Ibid. 44 Parshall, Phil, ibid., p207. 45 Lindsay, F. Duane, The Servant Songs. Chicago: Moody Press, 1985, p141,142. 97 46 Ibid., p11. 47 Badawi, Jamal, Islamic Teachings: Series C, Muhammad in the Bible/7. Jesus’ Prophesy (Audio Cassette E13). Halifax: Islamic Information Foundation, 1982, Side 2. 48 Badawi, Jamal, Islamic Teachings: Muhammad: Last Messenger of Allah (Audio Cassette L5,6). Halifax: Islamic Information Foundation, 1987, Side 2. 49 Motger, J. A., The Prophesy of Isaiah. Leicester: Intervarsity Press, 1993, p177. 50 Ibid. 51 Badawi, Jamal, Islamic Teachings: Muhammad: Last Messenger of Allah (Audio Cassette L5,6). Halifax: Islamic Information Foundation, 1987, Side 1. 52 Badawi, Jamal, Islamic Teachings: Series C, Muhammad in the Bible/7. Jesus’ Prophesy (Audio Cassette E13). Halifax: Islamic Information Foundation, 1982, Side 2. 53 Ibid. 54 Parshall, Phil, ibid., p135. 55 Chadwick, Samuel, The Way to Pentecost. London: Hoddar & Stoughton, 1932, p25. 56 Ibid. 57 Abdul-Haqq, Abdiyah, ibid., p38. 58 Ibid., p43. 59 Ibid., p44. 60 Ibid., p25. 61 Ibid., p39. 62 Ibid., p37,38. 63 McDowell, Josh, ibid., p166,167. 64 McDowell, Josh, New Evidence that Demands a Verdict. Nashville:Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1999, p194. 65 Fernando, Ajith, The Christian\'s Attitude Toward World Religions. Wheaton: Tyndale House Publishers, 1987, p73, quoting Donald Guthrie, New Testament Theology. 66 Metzger, Bruce, ibid., p74. 67 Ibid., p75. 68 Ibid., p77. 69 Ibid. 70 Ibid, p76. 71 Ibid. 72 Ibid. 73 Safra, Jacob E., The New Encyclopaedia Britannica/Macropaedia, Vol. 22. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc., 1997, p336. 74 Metzger, Bruce, Ibid., p78. 75 McBirnie, William, The Search For the Twelve Apostles. Wheaton: Tyndale House Publishers, 1977, p56. 76 Cave, William, The Lives, Acts, and Martyrdoms of the Holy Apostles of Our Savior. London, R. Royston, 1677, p44, citing Eusebius, Church History, Bk 2, Ch 17, p53. 77 McBirnie, William, ibid., p59, citing a quotation of G. Jowett, Drama of the Lost Disciples, who uses Simon Metaphrastes as his source for Eusebius. 78 Ibid., citing G. Jowett, Drama of the Lost Disciples. 79 Cave, William, ibid., citing John Chrysostome, Sermon on Peter and Paul, p267, T.6. 80 Cave, William, ibid., p135, citing Nicephorus, Menaea Graec., Bk 2, Ch 39, p200. 81 Ibid., p135,136, citing Bernard, p327. 82 McBirnie, William, ibid., p80-83, citing Newman, The Lives and Deaths of the Holy Apostles. 83 Ibid., p81. 84 Ibid., p90, citing Clement of Alexandria, Hypotyposis. 85 Ibid., p211,212, citing Dorotheus, Synod. de Apostol.; Synopsis ad Sim Zelot. 86 Ibid., p212, citing a quotation of Nicephorus, Bk 2, Ch 40, by Lionel Lewis, St. Joseph of Arimathea at Glastonburg. 87 Ibid., p198, citing Nicephorus, Church History, p240. 98 88 Cave, William, ibid., p210, citing Dorotheus, Synopsis de vit. App. in Bibl., Pp Tom.3, p148. 89 McBirnie, William, ibid., p125,126. 90 Ibid., p126,127. 91 Ibid., p123. 92 Ibid., p140. 93 Cave, William, ibid., p172. 94 Ibid., citing Hippolitus, De App. ap. Bar in Not ad Martyr. ad. 95 Ibid., citing Nicephorus, Church History, Bk 2 Ch 39, p201. 96 McBirnie, William, ibid., p175, citing quotations of Eusebius and Iranaeus by Tenney, The New Testament, A Survey. 97 Ibid., p176,177, citing a quotation of Ambrose by William Barclay, The Master's Men. 98 Ibid., p176,182. 99 Ibid., p176, citing Socrates, Church History, 1:19, as quoted by Barclay, The Master's Men. 100 Ibid., p175. 101 Ibid., p176, citing information from the Talmud, supplied by Barclay, The Master’s Men; p182 102 Cave, William, ibid., p178. 103 McBirnie, William, ibid., p147, citing church historian John Stewart. 104 Ibid., p158-160. 105 Ibid., p148,149. 106 Ibid., p154. 107 Ibid., p110. 108 Ibid. 109 Cave, William, ibid., p159, citing Iranaeus, Against Heresies, Bk 3, Ch 1. 110 McBirnie, William, ibid., p116,117. 111 Cave, William, ibid., p154, citing Jerome, Commentaries in Matthew 20, p59, Tom 9. 112 Budge, Earnest A. W., The Contendings of the Apostles, Vol. 2. New York: Oxford University Press, 1901, p265,266. 113 McBirnie, William, ibid., p283, citing a quotation of Jerome by Conybeare, The Life and Epistles of the Apostle Paul. 114 Ibid., p282, citing a quotation of Eusebius by Conybeare. 115 Ibid., p253,254, citing a quotation of Clement by Jerome, The Post Nicene Fathers. 116 Cave, William, ibid., p214, citing Eusebius, Church History, Bk 2, Ch 16, p53. 117 McBirnie, William, ibid., p256, citing Aziz Ataya, A History of Eastern Christianity. 118 Metzger, Bruce, ibid., p253. 119 Cave, William, ibid., p193, citing Eusebius who quotes Hegesippus, Commentary, Bk 5, Apud. Eusebius, Bk 2, Ch 23, p65. 120 Ibid., citing Epiphanius, Heresies, 78, p441, and also Hegesippus, Ap. Eusebius, Bk 2, Ch 23, p65. 121 Metzger, Bruce, ibid., p128. 122 Ibid. 123 Metzger, Bruce, ibid., p146. 124 Kyle, John, Urban Mission; The Urgency of the Call. Downer\'s Grove: Intervarsity Press, 1988, p148. 125 Ibid. 126 Metzger, Bruce, ibid., p166. 127 McDowell, Josh, ibid., p122. 128 Fernando, Ajith, ibid., p71. 129 Abdul-Haqq, Abdaiyah, ibid., p100. 130 Smith, Richard, Newsweek, 7 April, 1997, "The Next Level." New York: Newsweek Inc., 1997, p35. 131 Woodward, Kenneth, Newsweek, 7 April, 1997, "Christ and Comets." New York: Newsweek Inc., 1997, p41. 132 Ibid., p42. 133 Smith, Richard, ibid., p34. 134 Ibid., p35. 135 Ibid., p34. 136 Woodward, Kenneth, ibid., p42. 99 137 Safra, Jacob E., The New Encyclopaedia Britannica/Micropaedia, Vol. 3. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 1997, p551. 138 Mish, Fredrick C., Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 10th Ed. Springfield: Merriam-Webster, Inc., 1993, p606. 139 Safra, Jacob E., The New Encyclopaedia Britannica/Macropaedia, Vol. 14. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc., 1997, p757. 140 Neufeldt, Victoria, Webster's New World Dictionary, 3rd Ed. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1988, p296. 141 Lewis, C. S., Mere Christianity. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1981, p5. 142 Ibid., p5,6. 143 Knechtle, Cliffe, ibid., p78. 144 Knechtle, Cliffe, Cliffe Knechtle at Stanford University (Video Cassette Tape). Palo Alto: Stanford University Intervarsity Christian Fellowship, c. 1988. Scriptures quoted are predominantly from the New American Standard Bible ®, ©1960,1962,
1963,1968,1971,1972,1973,1975,1977,1995 the Lockman Foundation. 100
Davis, Ca.
Second Edition © 1999, 2004, Joseph A. Sherman
This mortal life also
The body they may kill
God's Truth abideth still
His Kingdom is forever"